Jump to content

UNUSUAL DAGGER - MADE IN Japan FOR CHINA?


Bazza

Recommended Posts

Gentle Ffolke,

 

I was at my antique arms collectors meeting one night when I espied an unusual dagger that looked like an extraordinarily small Shingunto, but wasn't.  The blade is a puzzle with a seemingly Japanese arsenal mark and a serial number, but otherwise shows no attributes of a finely formed and polished Nihonto blade.  The 'fuchi' decoration looks intended to appeal to Chinese tastes??  I have no idea what it is and show it for interest.

 

Bestests,

BaZZa.

post-671-0-66571600-1589973524_thumb.jpg       post-671-0-45959800-1589973574_thumb.jpg

post-671-0-33010000-1589973655_thumb.jpg  post-671-0-90861500-1589973734_thumb.jpg

post-671-0-91053800-1589973840_thumb.jpg    post-671-0-85602600-1589973897_thumb.jpg     post-671-0-70599000-1589974024_thumb.jpg

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite an amazing piece, whether original or post-war; whether Chinese or Bubba. Truly an exellent piece of work.

 

Thoughts:

1. It reminds me of Dawson's pages on Foot Soldier/Artillery SWord (pic attached). He had examples of wild custom jobs.

2. The mix of navy ashi and army Rinji-seishiki sayajiri/kabutogane + custom fuchi/koiguchi screams "Post-war". I can't see even a WWII custom shop mixing army & navy parts.

3. The Seki trademark, according to Ohmura, was created after 1940, yet the artillery sword was a late-1800's manufacture. And examples of the stamp observed are all post-1942.

4. Dawson's examples of the artillery sword don't show serial numbers on the blade, and the practice is LOVED by Chinese makers.

5. The kiku (Chrysanthemum) is 14 petal. My understanding is that Japanese kiku were 16.

7. The craftsmanship of the entire thing - how well everything fits, the details of the sakura, and metalwork, even the kissaki - are way better than any Chinese piece of fakery I've ever seen.

 

{insert emoji of through hands in the air}

 

It's quite a puzzle. One possibility - a late '40s skilled craftsman souvenir. It would explain the mix of army/navy/civil fittings, just like the Toyokawa souvenir sword.

post-3487-0-70240200-1589982763_thumb.jpeg

 

Even the ashi seem made in miniature for this piece. The detail is way better than Chinese work, and it's thinner and smaller than a standard sized navy ashi. Look how thick the standard size is:

post-3487-0-13371800-1589982861_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm the cannonball stamp is a Nagoya arsenal marking, where they produced many guns and bayonets, But yet to see something of that nature. Plus I don't recall Nagoya numbering their smaller blades so if it were real where are the others.

 

Just my novice opinion though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There wasn't any official, issued machete that I'm aware of. The Japanese captured large quantities of Dutch swords & bayonets. Swords were extensively reworked into machetes & bayonets were also modified to fit Japanese rifles. Here's a photo of a Dutch Klewang machete in my collection

post-2157-0-10647200-1590011951_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion someone made from a bayonet a hunting knife. Why not?

What kind of fake should it be?

Why should any chinese forge a camping bowie knife and make a nagoya arsenal stamp and numbers on it? Makes no sense. Its allways a bowie camping hunting knife ????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iv been reading some posts, and I'm surprised it's got this far.

 

 

150% modern crap, there are so many points to start on.

 

Firstly the style and shape is Not Japanese military at all,

Sukura is roughly s**t, is it a cherry or a plum. That aside a 5 petal sukura was used by police but this was not.

 

The large serial number? Would imply that it's army issued and owned, not like a shin gunto that was owned.

It's a over looked detail from fakers who think type 25, 32 and 95s etc are like kyu, Kai and shin gunto are the same.

 

 

It's offensively modern and fake,

 

Sorry bazza if was overly rude

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hamfish one question. If i would make a fake i would try to copy something. But what is copied with that piece? I didn't really understand it. What Japanese military piece is faked? 

 

Its a total scratch build knife. With some relations to Japanese army pieces (Stamp, Number and maybe the koshirae). But overall it is obvious not a copy of something that was produced. 

In my eyes it is a knife in Japanese army style (its not important were it was made). Nothing wrong with it. And with some care it will look nice and functional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 If you never look at or discuss the unusual or different, you are severely limiting yourself. There have been some surprises on this site and on others. Just because it does not conform does not mean it's wrong. I have no idea as to the origin of this piece, but if another one turns up we will know that it is probably a production run rather than a one off.

 

 It's not as if it costs us money!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iv been reading some posts, and I'm surprised it's got this far..

 

It's offensively modern and fake,

 

Sorry bazza if was overly rude

Hamish mate, I'm not in the slightest offended, not the slightest.  We are all about learning here and for me even severe criticism doesn't put my nose out of joint.  Frankly, I like your frank style of "putting it".

 

BaZZa

XXXX

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

... . I have no idea as to the origin of this piece, but if another one turns up we will know that it is probably a production run rather than a one off.

Dave, there is second, identical piece that has turned up.  Perhaps it slipped past you, but Marco in Post #12 drew our attention to it.  Good find Marco.  So it would seem to be part of a production run of some sort, somewhere:

 

http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/23394-trying-to-identify-a-sword/

 

Chris S in Post #22 also drew attention to the correct style of Japanese hilt binding.

 

BaZZa.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the other one is the same one. The Chinese have no issue with one off junk.
This is junk. Fake, Chinese junk. The metal is clearly junk, the fittings are probably an alloy. The stamps are not just hammered stamps, but machine hydraulic pressed (to death)
The blade sucks. The hi is machined on. Ito is cotton junk. Shape is crap. Ito triangles were done by a drunk one armed blind guy.
But I'm happy for opinions, and everyone is entitled to them...so as you were.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave, there is second, identical piece that has turned up.  Perhaps it slipped past you, but Marco in Post #12 drew our attention to it.  Good find Marco.  So it would seem to be part of a production run of some sort, somewhere:

 

http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/23394-trying-to-identify-a-sword/

 

Chris S in Post #22 also drew attention to the correct style of Japanese hilt binding.

 

BaZZa.

 

Wow Bazza, cool. I cant remember on that. But it looks absolut similar made.

 

No. here: 015728

On the link: 187530

 

Another idea. Japanese Tourist piece?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...