Jump to content

Fatal Flaws & Shinsa


TheGermanBastard

Recommended Posts

I would like to seek some oppinions / expirience please on the consideration of fatal flaws and (NBTHK) Shinsa process.

 

I am aware that there are papered swords with dipping Hamon, missing Boshi or Hagire. Of course this is not the common rule but the exception. So what are the condition to warrant a Hozon paper for a sword with a basically fatal flaw? Well, in general I would answer myself by saying that the sword just needs to be important enough. But what does this mean more precisely? I can imagine for example a rare signed example by an important smith.

 

I am asking because I have a very unfortunate sword in my posession which has seen sever abuse. Likely by children playing sword fighting with it.

 

As a result he blade is badly nicked. All of the nicks could be eliminated but this would take away too much metal and thus also the workmanship in the blade. Most unfortunate there are severe nicks on the Kissaki, One may or may not be through the Boshi. But when wanting to remove those the Boshi would be gone for sure. So I see presently these options:

 

1. Remove all nicks => Lossig Boshi and rendering Hamon very thin & close to the edge.

 

2. Keep some nicks  and fix uop Kissaki loosing most or all of the Boshi

 

3. Only remove minor nicks keeping most of the temper in the blade

 

Personally I tend to option 3

 

The blade in question is Aoe work to the best of my knowledge and after having consulted some dealers / collectors who should know better than I do.

 

Wheter it is early or late Aoe I do not know and it would need to be polished and see Shinsa.

 

However and this leads to  my intitial question it would not make sense to send to Shinsa when it comes get pinked hence without oppinion.

 

It would then be just an additional waste of money wher ethis whole project is some sort of economic Harakiri.

 

This sword is more of a heart affair than a wise investment. Having been collecting and buying out of the woodwork swords it is just so hard to find something like Aoe ... and then once it happens it comes in such a bad condition due to abuse, Cynical.

 

Stll I thik the sword is just too good to go and should be preserved for what good workmanship can still be observed in it.

 

Then as a family father I may one day have to sell it again and I think a paper would very much help in this special case as it would prove that it is really somthing wortyh of preservation.

 

Thank you for your thoughts

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this gets said here all the time, but in this case the opinion of a qualified polisher would be critical. The polisher should be able to give you their opinion of Kantei while at the same time judge the best option for polish and what you will have left after polish is done, 1) nice blade, 2) nice blade with a bunch of nicks, 3) toothpick with not much left, 4) etc

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NBTHK certainly has the option to paper a blade with significant flaws, Luis. Look at the blade that Ray has posted: http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/32146-sue-koto-mino-kanemoto-wakizashi/ I was sure that kakedasu hamon would take all but the top-echelon blades out of consideration, but here's an exception.

 

Trying to second-guess what they'll actually do on any specific blade is a crap-shoot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I read somewhere that they do paper flawed blades if: they are from older and older time periods or if the blade represents possibly the only exemplar from that smith or if the smith is extremely renown.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would a mumei AOE blade with fatal flaws, be worth the cost of its polish even if it returned as Hozon? You need an extremely skilled polisher to navigate such wreck to begin with, and this will run you 4000$ or about, and a year or more of waiting. If it was a unicorn smith, signed work, e.g. a completely wrecked Daijimbo with chips all over the ha and and a hamon running off, then why not. It would still constitute a highly valuable reference material in spite of its fatally compromised condition.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just my thoughts. As a novice in the Nihonto field I thought about your dilemma and what I would do if the sword were mine. I think that sometimes you have to look past a flaw or damage to a blade to see the original beauty of the blade. If you can look past this and imagine ( sometimes it takes more imagination than other times ) the original intent of the sword smith and the beauty that he instilled in the blade is all it takes. That being said I think for me I would have a window ( as large as possible without getting into a damaged area ) polished into the blade. After this I would be proud to display the blade with all of its condition problems, but a beautiful window showing the original beauty of the sword and the skill of the original sword smith. Rather than polish out some of that beauty or change the original configuration of the blade or loose any of the original Hamon, I would be very happy with a “before and after” knowing that I had a original treasure. Just my 2cents.

         MikeR

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...