Jump to content

Mei or Gimei - Minatagawa Blade Help!


Recommended Posts

Bruce, it looks like dremel tool tracks in the kissaki... I'm sure you noticed them.  The rust patterns  look fishy and/or cleaned around the mei. That spidery rust is shocking. But it's an interesting hamon.  I'd pass. Especially if the price isn't low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruce,

 

The condition of the blade is so so, but the Hamon is beautiful and I don’t see anything wrong with the signature personally. I know that if I had the money, I’d certainly bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The seller being who it is, I would not be hesitant. Sometimes knowing who the seller is makes the difference. In this case, you have a guarantee and some provenance and fallback.
Buying from sellers who turn out to be be known and longtime members here does help.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruce, it looks like dremel tool tracks in the kissaki... I'm sure you noticed them.  The rust patterns  look fishy and/or cleaned around the mei. That spidery rust is shocking. But it's an interesting hamon.  I'd pass. Especially if the price isn't low.

I think the marks in the kissaki that look like dremel tool tracks are in fact that odd-looking sort of concentric rust pattern that is like jorin mokume...  This adds to an impression that the sword has been stored for many years under less than ideal conditions.

 

https://markussesko.com/2015/05/13/kantei-2-jigane-jihada-2/ (do a Ctrl F on jorin)

 

http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/27115-tsuba-patina/  (Post #27)

 

BaZZa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need to be wary of making absolute claims without proof. And they also need to consider this is a wartime sword, not some aged Koto.
I personally don't see much discrepancy and since we don't know how these were produced or signed or who signed them at the time, I would not make any absolute claim without a shinsa.
The seller is a member here and I am not happy with comments that will influence the price. But that said...Fred did post it in a comment section. So just go easy guys. This could be a very nice item and does come with a guarantee.

Anyways, a proper comparison shows than not even the 'confirmed' one is perfect or fluent.

03.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for the input! And Brian, thanks for the info that the seller is a trusted member here. I don't doubt his integrity. Fleabay policy won't let me cancel my bid, so I'm not getting out of it. I seriously doubt, though, that I will win the bid as my offer is well under market value for a kai, much less a Minotogawa blade.

 

As to the gunto - I'm overall fairly comfortable with the mei. I've seen enough variations in WWII stuff to not expect perfection. The are no terribly obvious flaws, just variation, to my eye (ok, very inexperienced eye!). And I've seen enough variation in kikusui mon - they were hand-cut, not stamped.

 

I don't know enough about the Minotogawa operation. Were all smiths required to personally sign their blades? Or did they have (what's the word?) guy doing mei for them? Did they teach apprentices? And did those apprentices sign?

 

If I win the bid, I'll have a better look in-hand. My collection is full of not-perfect pieces. I truly love the immaculate ones some of you guys have, but my collection tends to run on a more commoner-gunto path. The biggest bother, to me, is the weird seppa. But I've bought gold-painted gunto, so I've seen worse!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me first say I make no claim to be an expert on anything. I have however been looking at gendai swords for a while now. Bought my first one, a Kasama Shigetsugu in 1983. Information on gendaito was pretty hard to come by in those days. I do not and have never owned a Minatogawa sword.
One thing I was taught, was that the blade’s the thing. Always look at the quality of the steel first. Then the other qualities, with the signature coming last. In the discussions regarding the sword at hand all I have seen are comments about the mon, the signature and the seppa. It’s as if we’re discussing a signature that has a blade attached to it. What about the blade? What about the steel? How do these qualities compare to other Minatogawa swords?
 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a really poor picture off a websearch (don't know the source book) and the mei seems quite similar:

attachicon.gifff4fde6fcba4ba048a68766d5276262b.jpg

 

Another similar:

 

attachicon.gif20170811_162153 1000.jpg

 

Slightly different:

 

attachicon.gifmasataka.jpg

 

The book the image is from is Herman Wallinga's "Gendaito Made at the Minaotgawa Shrine" 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...