Jump to content

Opinons On This Possibly Old Blade?


USkragnut

Recommended Posts

I recently acquired this and am hoping its an ancestral blade. The saya is a standard late war type, black lacquered wood with leather wrap. The tsuka and the rest of the koshirae are long lost. Not sure if the blade was originally carried in this or the two were simply combined by its post WWII owners, however the blade does seem to fit the saya well.

 

Length is a rather typical 26.5 inches from the kisecki to the back of the hibacki notch of the blade. I do not know if this was the blades original length or it was brought to this by its last polisher. Its in very nice shape with what I believe to be its original WWII polish with only some fine scuffs from the saya and a couple small spots of tarnish. There are no flaws in the blade and no nicks in the edge. 

 

The hada is not really discernable. THis had me concerned that perhaps this was just a water quenched machine made blade however the hamon and nakago make me believe otherwise. The hamon has two distinct and easily seen (though not so easily photographed pacing around my bonus room late at night) shadows of crystalline structure to it. They are very consistent in width and clarity along the top of the hamon. On the few spots of the nakago that dont have heavy pitting, you can see that the draw file marks have been almost completely obliterated by previous periods of erosion. A few places on the left side make me think I see the remnants of a signature but its so eroded I can't tell and the blade may be mumei. I think the nakago was cleaned by its wartime polisher or owner, and possibly waxed to prevent further destruction to the metal.

 

While I don't think it is the lost Honjo Masamune, it is very attractive and would like to believe it is a true nihonto. How would I proceed further to determine this and a possible era / value?

 

As always, much thanks to all the members here more knowledgeable than I.

 

Regards

Sean T.

post-931-0-51470500-1527995518_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-88541900-1527995528_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-78255900-1527995537_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-31139600-1527995544_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-64453200-1527995551_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-74305800-1527995560_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-61699400-1527995568_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Sean,

The nakago bothers me.  The pitting seems unnatural, the shinogi looks like it doesn't run true from the blade down into the nakago (it drifts toward the ha), the yasurime I can see are too distinct for a nakago that is so heavily corroded, and the mune of the nakago has an atypical curvature.  Your picture of the hamon is a bit troubling also.  I can't be even close to positive about this but I wonder if this might be something other than true Nihonto and a lot younger than it would like us to believe.

I'm very curious to read what others have to say (and for your sake I hope I'm wrong).

Grey

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmmmm, yairs...  The nakago looks like it was at one time very heavily rusted and has been wire-brushed to "clean it up".  Wire-brushed heavy rust has a glossy, even waxy appearance.  The vestige of O-sujikai yasurime on the nakago suggest a WW2 Gifu Showa-to and the very questionable yakiire/hamon points to a quench that has gone horribly wrong.  Summary, disregard it a get thee to a better sword...

 

BaZZa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its definitely a hand polished blade with a differentially hardened edge, the shape from the shinogi down to the ha is nicely convex (my favorite shape rather than a flatter profile). The clarity of the hamon makes me pretty sure its at least water and not oil quenched, however I have owned WWII military gunto swords that were also water quenched and still had a Seki stamp.

 

Well, wiping the oil off the blade with a soft cloth didnt help my photography as it reveals a lot of the fine scratches in the blade from the saya. Boshi is ko maru but its hard for me to photograph. My hope was that this was a Shinshinto or at least an early Gendai blade that an Army swordsmith polished down to a rather standard shape and size before returning to its owner. If its simply a machine made gunto being passed off as a fake then a previous owner went to a lot of trouble to corrode the nakago to this level of damage. As I noted previously, the damage appears to be of different eras, but thats just my opinion. Upon reflection I agree that the nakago has been wire brushed, and by a previous owner, not the swordsmith as I realize such a practice is frowned upon. Although I am just an apprentice around here, my background in antique and collectible firearms has allowed me to help many others identify fake vintage Colts etc and given me a wide familiarity with fakers and their techniques. Obviously here my Spidey-Sense is scrambled.

 

As always I really appreciate and enjoy the feedback from more experienced members here. My grandfather (a man far wiser than me) taught me that cruel honesty is better than compassionate  falsehood :-)

 

Regards

 

Sean T.

 

 

Hi Sean,

The nakago bothers me.  The pitting seems unnatural, the shinogi looks like it doesn't run true from the blade down into the nakago (it drifts toward the ha), the yasurime I can see are too distinct for a nakago that is so heavily corroded, and the mune of the nakago has an atypical curvature.  Your picture of the hamon is a bit troubling also.  I can't be even close to positive about this but I wonder if this might be something other than true Nihonto and a lot younger than it would like us to believe.

I'm very curious to read what others have to say (and for your sake I hope I'm wrong).

Grey

post-931-0-28115100-1528028964_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-81555500-1528028971_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-95097100-1528028980_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-17494200-1528028990_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-03996200-1528028999_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-45459500-1528029006_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few more final pics with a small amount of choji on the blade after I re oiled it last night. Viewed head on and at a casual glance, the hamon is quite brite but seems somewhat homogeneous in pattern (first photo). Tilted at various angles, you get other things appearing. It almost makes me think the unusual activity in the hamon is a sign that this was at one time a larger blade that was polished down as the result of fire or water damage. A wet tsuka would help explain the extensive damage to the nakago (new picture included). Or perhaps wishful thinking? In any case the spots of tarnish on the blade are present sporadically on the left side primarily along the mune.

 

 

 

 

 

post-931-0-90838600-1528043503_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-95243300-1528043541_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-86772600-1528043577_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-86632200-1528043589_thumb.jpg

post-931-0-45649600-1528043850_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kissaki shape does not flow favorably with the sugata; the hamon seems artificially enhanced and does not appear to have been polished traditionally. The nakago appearance is unusual....it is hard for me to say more from photos.

Edit: The kissaki shape in the first photo may have been an angle artifact; it looked ok in a different photo. Other comments remain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting how good a fake this one was. Most of the Chinese forgeries are pretty laughable and easily spotted even by a relative novice like myself. This sword was much harder to spot for me but I had a hunch so I posted it here. At the very least I thought it was a rusted and re-polished showato, which I also have an interest in as they are military collectibles and still have an air of the Japanese fighting spirit. They even went so far as to make it exactly 26.5 inches from the kiseki to the habaki notch. The lack of visible hada combined with the bright and unusual hamon should have been am obvious clue...the oil quenched blades of most showato are not nearly as bright. Even my Nagamitsu in fairly nice polish is not this bright.

 

 

Note the similar hataraki in the attached photos, which is also dissimilar to what you expect to see in an authentic Japanese sword. Looks like your sword came out of the same 'Changtian-sword' forge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot as the owner has graciously agreed to take it back and it is gone. The mune was a fairly shallow peak though, I believe it was fairly continuous out to the kiseki.

 

Except for the noted problems with the nakago, the form of the blade was fairly decent. Never crossed my mind it might be a fake, only that it might be Showato.

 

 

can you show a pic of the mune/spine of the kissaki?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot as the owner has graciously agreed to take it back and it is gone. The mune was a fairly shallow peak though, I believe it was fairly continuous out to the kiseki.

 

Except for the noted problems with the nakago, the form of the blade was fairly decent. Never crossed my mind it might be a fake, only that it might be Showato.

 

i see. i wanted to see if a kesho-migaki was present; almost all nihonto have a polisher's mark there; hazuya polish with nagashi is not found

in chinese copies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...