Jump to content

Informations About The Rjt


vajo

Recommended Posts

 I remember " Ryujin swords" (there is more than one firm using the name) mentioning going through the skin of a Gunto, after a Japanese polisher had refused to touch it, telling him it would just be a chunk of modern steel. In fact, it's the reason they did that very handy guide about Showa manufacturing methods, which now looks to have disappeared off the internet :( I will post that again, and also 2 very handy diagrams about construction of blades, and apologies if this info' is redundant.

Ryujin swords.jpg

866f1434334355cc0196f1b569cbeb16.jpg

Katana_brique.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Dave,

Oh, I see, not RJT in three classes but gendaito in general. ..that explains it....yes sure, RJT are mid-level to upper level IMO.

I have not seen one (yet) with kizu or flaws, but who knows.

I have not seen Yasukunito with kizu or flaws that I can remember either, but on Yasukunito, I have noticed that of the 5 or 6 that I have had the opportunity to handle over the last few decades, 4 had badly rusted tangs. In fact they were "rotten tangs" from the nakago tip right up to the mekugi ana - only the tangs at the mei area were OK. Made me think that there was some feature of their tamahagane that was liable to rust. The two "good" ones Yasunori (naval mounts) and Yasuoki were very good. Anyway, like you I have not chased Yasukunito....but I do like RJT. Again, that said, I have to LIKE the sword, I don't just buy the 'type'.

Interesting discussion Dave, thanks...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that this general classification of methods is correct. 

The smiths who took part on the RJT program made the swords in the way they have learned it. 

You can't say they where made in Kobuse or Soshu kitae or what ever without destroying the sword.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dave R said:

 I remember "Ryujin swords" (there is more than one firm using the name) mentioning going through the skin of a Gunto, after a Japanese polisher had refused to touch it, telling him it would just be a chunk of modern steel. In fact, it's the reason they did that very handy guide about Showa manufacturing methods, which now looks to have disappeared off the internet :( I will post that again, and also 2 very handy diagrams about construction of blades, and apologies if this info' is redundant.

 

I was able to view and download the webpage in question via the Wayback Machine.  It was, as you inferred, a rather interesting read.  I for one am glad that you have such a good memory!

Wayback Machine

ryujinswords-tang-stamps-2017-1218.pdf

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kiipu said:

 

I was able to view and download the webpage in question via the Wayback Machine.  It was, as you inferred, a rather interesting read.  I for one am glad that you have such a good memory!

Wayback Machine

ryujinswords-tang-stamps-2017-1218.pdf 155.5 kB · 5 downloads

 

 Thank you very much for your hard work in recovering this article. One has to wonder why such a useful source of information disappeared... You now know where  I have some of my less mainstream ideas and opinions from.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, george trotter said:

Hi Dave,

Oh, I see, not RJT in three classes but gendaito in general. ..that explains it....yes sure, RJT are mid-level to upper level IMO.

I have not seen one (yet) with kizu or flaws, but who knows.

I have not seen Yasukunito with kizu or flaws that I can remember either, but on Yasukunito, I have noticed that of the 5 or 6 that I have had the opportunity to handle over the last few decades, 4 had badly rusted tangs. In fact they were "rotten tangs" from the nakago tip right up to the mekugi ana - only the tangs at the mei area were OK. Made me think that there was some feature of their tamahagane that was liable to rust. The two "good" ones Yasunori (naval mounts) and Yasuoki were very good. Anyway, like you I have not chased Yasukunito....but I do like RJT. Again, that said, I have to LIKE the sword, I don't just buy the 'type'.

Interesting discussion Dave, thanks...

Regarding the rusted Nakago, I wonder if it is related to the process of dipping the Nakago into salt water before placing it the Tsuka for a superior lockup? My other thought it was really just used hard and put away wet in the field.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the rusty tang Yasukunito...I just don't know the reason. All I can say is I have noticed it as it was "common" on the Yasukunito I have seen.

 

Regarding the quality of RJT blades. I am no expert on any blade but have collected for a long time. I started in Koto/shinto/shinshinto years ago (see pic -  top to bot: Mino Kanesada 1700s, Kanabo Masazane 1530s, 3 gen Echizen Yastusugu 1660s, Ishido Mitsuhira 1660s, Shimada Sadasuke early shinto) so I know quality work when I see it. I went to RJT out of personal interest and can say that I think the work is very good. We don't know the exact details of course, but the RJT material, workmanship, inspection, testing process as set up was first class. I am not going to test one, but I think an RJT would stand up to one of the pre-WWII swords very well.

I have never seen a flawed one, but I have seen a few that just don't "appeal" to me. 

So long story short, I have to wonder where all these doubts and debate about "standards" of quality and not surviving one polish are coming from.

They are good swords made to do a good job...period. It seems to me all this chatter is just that (no offence intended).

trotter sold swords.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my small collection of RJT gendaito. I have swords of all periods in collection but my true love are these RJT ones. If you compare the swords you see how different they are. The quality is wide above from most of that what you will in other periods. Not one sword has a forging flaw. These are strong swords. Some have a brutal cutter design, others are made as fast fighting swords. I love them all.

 

image.thumb.png.1bff158cc5a96606695594e74ff6d750.png

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Wow 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice.

Is no. 6 the famous Tsukamoto Okimasa? - if so, I have one by his elder brother Tsukamoto Masakazu (private order, no star, made 4/17 - he was an RJT by then I think).

Also, is no. 9 Yamagami Akimitsu (looks like) - if so I have an RJT by his elder brother Munetoshi (64.0 cm, short kissaki, sturdy blade, made 5/18), and also a private order by Munetosh (66.0 cm, long kissaki, lighter, more elegant blade, made 9/16).

Although I also have a 69.8 cm RJT blade (the RJT scheme regulations allowed it), it is interesting in the case of Munetoshi, who made elegant swords privately, made shorther, sturdier blades for RJT scheme.

An interesting field of study the RJT sword.

Regards,

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes George. It is Tsukamoto Okimasa & Yamagami Akihisa.

The swords have a wide range of size, weight and design. You are so right. It is really fascinating to study and compare the swords. The RJT program allows a lot of variations in the scheme of forging these swords. 

 

Looking on the different boshi and shape i find nearly all sword periods in that swords.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks George

 

There are so many works of high rated RJT that i never have seen on the market and at the monent with all that covid restrictions it is not easy to buy and get it. I hope that will be better in the future. Some Jo-Saku smiths would be very exciting to have. But mostly they are all hidden in collections :laughing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little seen RJT (star stamp) smith is ENDO TOMONARI. Here is a July 1944 example, in premium RS mounts. It is in war time polish, which is very basic as are all war time polishes. But polished enough to see a wide suguha hamon, and hada. This is a powerful sword, that would give confidence to the officer who would use it. 

It would be stunning polished, but I tend to like swords the way they were found. 

a9.jpg

a10.jpg

aa11.jpg

a12.jpg

a13.jpg

a14.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
8 hours ago, Droocoo said:

Have you got a photograph of that sword?

Just these 3

Edit: Dang.  The nakago seem to be the same sword.  Yet the open spaces in the ito, at the top of the tsuka look different.  Maybe @IJASWORDS can tell us if these are just older pics of his gunto?  Or am I looking at 2 different swords?

a15.thumb.jpg.ae2217aaaf28d272a23b4e5c5c4ead8e.jpg

a16.thumb.jpg.d58a6649ea1c2ccea1e7fffa6f01d5a6.jpg

a18.thumb.jpg.f7f78e277f38b270475fb93fdf8b0223.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...