John C Posted April 10 Report Posted April 10 29 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said: looks as if it's a 95 with a leather covered saya. If the distribution of type 95s as reenlistment gifts were a common practice, it at least gives us another explanation as to how swords were brought back other than as "war trophies." John C. 1 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted April 11 Author Report Posted April 11 15 hours ago, John C said: If the distribution of type 95s as reenlistment gifts were a common practice, it at least gives us another explanation as to how swords were brought back other than as "war trophies." John C. Nice learning another reason/method for passing these out. I think it was Fuller that described the fact that of the 600,000 swords collected by the Allies, they saved half (I think he stated somewhere around 260,000) to be "distributed." Your example is clearly one of many ways they must have passed them out. Quote
Rawa Posted April 12 Report Posted April 12 https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/-2075970B25 another one 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted April 12 Author Report Posted April 12 Good one. I hate it when the sellers don't post nakago shots. Fortunately, in the description, they say it's anchor stamped and painted "79." Quote
Nazar Posted May 17 Report Posted May 17 Another one. https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/sword-authentic-wwii-Japanese-kai-4933955248 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted May 17 Author Report Posted May 17 Thanks Nazar! This one is interesting because of the crack in the saya showing it was made with lacquer over cloth. I checked mine, and it was made of solid wood, then lacquer. Quote
Nazar Posted Monday at 05:01 AM Report Posted Monday at 05:01 AM My kai-gunto saya is also solid wood. I wonder if that cloth was used as putty (to make the surface more even) or for reinforcement? Quote
Rawa Posted Monday at 02:17 PM Report Posted Monday at 02:17 PM (edited) Probably to speed up production. Urushi with black dye (roiro urushi?) on cloth gives thicker layer. Edited Monday at 02:19 PM by Rawa 2 1 Quote
Justin Grant Posted Monday at 04:44 PM Report Posted Monday at 04:44 PM Urushi on fabric is a well known Japanese Armor trick. You will find all sorts of pieces this way. It makes them strong and water resistant. 3 Quote
eternal_newbie Posted Monday at 05:00 PM Report Posted Monday at 05:00 PM 13 minutes ago, Justin Grant said: Urushi on fabric is a well known Japanese Armor trick. You will find all sorts of pieces this way. It makes them strong and water resistant. You can even find some koshirae where the tsukamaki has been lacquered, ostensibly for the same purpose. 1 Quote
Rawa Posted Thursday at 08:06 PM Report Posted Thursday at 08:06 PM Boys look in other thread t98 with lacquered saya, clearly fabric under lacquer Quote
Scogg Posted Thursday at 08:32 PM Report Posted Thursday at 08:32 PM On 5/17/2026 at 10:37 AM, Nazar said: Another one. https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/sword-authentic-wwii-Japanese-kai-4933955248 Apologies for drifting off topic a little, but it looks like this one was so aggressively cleaned that the spine has gone from iori-mune to maru-mune or mitsu-mune. Amongst wartime Gendaito and Showato, do we ever see maru-mune or mitsu-mune? I’m not sure I recall ever seeing something other than iori-mune. Best, -Sam 1 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted Friday at 07:39 AM Report Posted Friday at 07:39 AM 11 hours ago, Scogg said: ......it looks like this one was so aggressively cleaned that the spine has gone from iori-mune to maru-mune or mitsu-mune...... That was the guy who "cleaned" his car with an angle-grinder.... 1 1 Quote
John C Posted Friday at 02:22 PM Report Posted Friday at 02:22 PM 17 hours ago, Scogg said: spine has gone from iori-mune to maru-mune or mitsu-mune. It seems the mune-machi (and ha-machi for that matter) is deeply cut. I wonder if the blade were a little too wide and it was done to fit a scabbard? Otherwise, I would think iori-mune would be standard. John C. 1 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted Friday at 03:18 PM Report Posted Friday at 03:18 PM 4 hours ago, John C said: ....I wonder if the blade were a little too wide and it was done to fit a scabbard? .... John, in that case, wouldn't it be easier to take some material off of the wooden scabbard liner?. Quote
Scogg Posted Friday at 04:58 PM Report Posted Friday at 04:58 PM Indeed Jean, maybe "cleaned" was not the best word choice for this situation. "Abraded" or maybe "grinded to oblivion" would have been more appropriate -Sam Quote
John C Posted Friday at 05:56 PM Report Posted Friday at 05:56 PM 2 hours ago, ROKUJURO said: in that case, wouldn't it be easier to take some material off of the wooden scabbard liner? Possibly, yes. As a woodworker it would be my first thought. But the wood is very thin on those so maybe not enough "fleisch". We'll never know I guess. John C. Quote
Nazar Posted Friday at 06:24 PM Report Posted Friday at 06:24 PM Yet one. This one is curious because of habaki fitment. I wonder if the reason for this mismatch is that they started to run out of parts that more or less fit each other? https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/Japanese-ww2-navy-kai-gunto-sword-4728816675 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted Friday at 06:52 PM Report Posted Friday at 06:52 PM Nazar, I saw this as well, and I would like to see if the MACHI truly align. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted Friday at 09:49 PM Author Report Posted Friday at 09:49 PM Yes, you can see on the zoom: It looks to me as if the habaki is just misaligned, shifted upward too much. 1 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago Thank you Bruce, I can see it now. It is just a wrong HABAKI. It could be dangerous to handle the sword as the blade could come loose and the MEKUGI could just fall out. Quote
vajo Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago The habaki didn't fit to the blade. Its not original. 1 Quote
Rawa Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago (edited) Double anchor stamp, did We had it already? It’s hard to memorize 23 pages https://www.antique-swords.com/zw52-ww2-Japanese-naval-officers-kai-gunto-gendaito-belts/ Could this blade have been replaced? Edited 16 hours ago by Rawa 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted 8 hours ago Author Report Posted 8 hours ago 7 hours ago, Rawa said: did We had it already? That's a new one, thanks! I've written to the seller to see if he'll give us a full nakago shot. The belt is an unknown, as to whether the sword shop added it, or the G.I., or a post-war owner. Quote
John C Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bruce Pennington said: That's a new one, Bruce: What were the differences again between the small and large anchors? John C. Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted 4 hours ago Author Report Posted 4 hours ago John, We don't know. All we could do is make a systematic survey of naval swords to see if there is a timeline difference in use. Not even sure if one could identify location differences as most of these are mumei. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.