Jump to content

New Katana - Not Sure What I Have Here?


FletchSan

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I picked this up today and would like some guidance as to what period and school it may be. It doesn't appear to be koto based on the sugata though does have utsuri. The hada is clearly visible and it has a nice straight hamon.

 

It is mumei though at the base of the nakago seems to have a signature / stamp though i can't make it out. Has anyone seen this done before?

 

It seems to be in reasonable polish and very healthy. No idea about the fittings and what was original to the sword though it all fits together very nicely.

 

Nagasa is 66.5cm.

 

cheers,

 

Ben

post-3412-0-76940200-1480480744_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-90770600-1480480747_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-20667700-1480480749_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-07293600-1480480751_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-03019700-1480480752_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-59697300-1480480753_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-81044000-1480480755_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-12399000-1480480757_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-63227200-1480486978_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-12174700-1480503988_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to get a clearer image of the mark - though not sure if this is the right way around or not.

 

Also tried to get a clearer image of the hada and boshi.

 

Other than the sugata, what else do you think points to a later copy Franco?

To be honest, It did feel different to my other koto swords - a bit heavier and seems to have had less polishes in its lifetime.

 

A few more measurements

 

Nagasa                  66.5cm

Sori                        1.3cm

Width (motohaba): 3cm

kasane                   0.7cm

kissaki                    5cm

 

 

Could the kanji be this?

 

 

Apparently translates to Buddhist temple?

post-3412-0-40551700-1480498391_thumb.gif

post-3412-0-64275900-1480498392_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-09551200-1480498394_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-59256400-1480498407_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-58779200-1480503038_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-10678400-1480503040_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting feature of the sword is that there appears to be two parallel utsuri also in the shinogi-ji that show up as a parallel mist as you run a light across the blade. I've tried to capture this in a photo & video.

 

Does this help place the sword in either a period or school?

post-3412-0-76944300-1480596707_thumb.gif

post-3412-0-58316200-1480596710_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-48901400-1480598423_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ben, IMHO. I think Franco has it right, shin-shinto or possibly later Jitetsu looks shinshinto? and overall does not have that late koto look to me and I don't think its old koto so that leaves shin-shinto copy of older blade ? and if it was about 75cm when it was original is also in line with shin-shinto :-?  but that's just going on the pics. Carlo, I also think the kissaki has been reshaped maybe to fix a chip in the boshi ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are pics taken above the munemachi and kissaki.

 

Assuming that it is Shinshinto or later, I have a few questions.

 

1. Would the intention of the smith be to deceive to make the sword appear to be Koto or would it be a homage to a Koto sword?

    I would have thought that if it a smith was making a copy that they would keep it ubu and not osuriage as that is a lot of effort for what are reasonably common and inexpensive swords (mumei osuriage Koto).

    [EDIT: Just read in another topic that this did occasionally occur given the resurgence of smiths making swords in the Koto style during the Shinshinto period. Interesting and may answers Q2]

 

2. Why did they shorten Shinshinto swords?

3. If it is a homage, could it have been a temple offering given the Kanji on the nakagojiri looks like the character for temple?

 

4. Any clues in the koshirae mons or Tsuba? (Obviously later than the sword though they fit the sword well and may have some relevance). 

post-3412-0-61473600-1480669372_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-34316200-1480670308_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-13720400-1480670311_thumb.jpg

post-3412-0-05903100-1480670460.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two Utsuri ?

I do not think so. It is either a problem of the polish or the  result  of the construction of the blade. In my point  of vie the first one is the case.

Often one  finds "utsuri" near the shinogi. In those cases the  lazy polisher did not  use the  jitsuya enough near the shinogi in fear to disturb it.

A similar effect is true in the  cases of the migaki-ji in the shinogiji.

I ve seen this many times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ben,

 

Thanks for additional images. 

 

A few more measurements

 

Nagasa                  66.5cm

Sori                        1.3cm

Width (motohaba): 3cm

kasane                   0.7cm

kissaki                    5cm

 

This sword has been polished down some, was hoping the additional images might tell more. My thoughts are moving towards Shinto at this point. I do think that this sword would look considerably different/better with a 'good polish.'

 

 

 

 

Assuming that it is Shinshinto or later, I have a few questions.

 

1. Would the intention of the smith be to deceive to make the sword appear to be Koto or would it be a homage to a Koto sword?

    I would have thought that if it a smith was making a copy that they would keep it ubu and not osuriage as that is a lot of effort for what are reasonably common and inexpensive swords (mumei osuriage Koto).

    [EDIT: Just read in another topic that this did occasionally occur given the resurgence of smiths making swords in the Koto style during the Shinshinto period. Interesting and may answers Q2]

 

2. Why did they shorten Shinshinto swords?

 

4. Any clues in the koshirae mons or Tsuba? (Obviously later than the sword though they fit the sword well and may have some relevance). 

 

1) The copying of other/earlier swords has been going on for ages, and unless there is the presence of a sketchy mei involved deception doesn't really enter the equation. 

 

2) Swords are shortened for any number of reasons, anyone's guess or speculation. 

 

4) Looks like Owari style fittings, tsuba???, Tokugawa mon, relevance???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why to shorten  an shinshinto blade. Well it must look like koto simply in order to achieve an higher selling price.

I did have  the honour  to handle an Hosoda Naomasa ( brother  of Kajihei ) blade. For the  untrained eye ? Wow ! Nambokucho three times shortend. The  Saya-Gaki did say "Chogi". A forgery in the sweetest Soden-style.

Nevertheles, a good blade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...