Jump to content

Papers


Jimmy R

Recommended Posts

Jim, what do you want to know? Do these papers look genuine or fake?

 

The Norimune paperwork on the right looks right, although aside from the photo, the Mei is only recorded in pencil top left of the envelope, not in ink. ("Studied under Sukemune".) It does go into some detail regarding the blade itself and activity within. No mention of what organization they are. Further paperwork missing? Simply someone's opinion?

 

The older paperwork on the left looks good to my untrained eye, though the -Kuni of Katsukuni on the envelope is hard to see, and I do not know this particular organization. 美術日本刀保存審査会 Bijutsu-Nihonto-Shinsakai. Cannot see any Mei on the nakago. The age, Kanbun, seems to fit, as do the dimensions. If it is a clever fake, then I need to do some more homework.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy,

I dont know th organisation that produced these. They are not from either of the two most recognised authentiaction bodies, the NBTHK or NTHK (either),

​Wihtout knowing the organisation that produced them it is difficult to gauge their likely accuracy

I am guessing hey are either dealer or polisher produced. That doesn't mean they are wrong but they don't carry the commercial authority of papers from the main groups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think that the  green paper is fake. Please take a close look on the stamp above the  nakago photo. It should have the exakt same  dimensions as the

stamp below the name of the  society. If my  old eyes are not  playjng a trick to me, the  stamp over the  nakago is more  longish and it is broken. There seems to be a gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Stefan,

the gap in the stamp above is caused by the thickness of the glued in picture.

Regards

O.K. I see.  Than only  one  question : Why is the stamp  longish an not ident with the other one.

Probably a stupid  question, but after seeing to many fake  papers  i am pretty  nitpicking about such details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have given those papers the benefit of doubt (i.e. being issued by some little known organizations) if it wasn't for the obvious attempt to make them look like (old) NBTHK and NTHK papers at first glance. It is clear that they were made to deceive, and therefore details of the seals etc. are irrelevant.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have given those papers the benefit of doubt (i.e. being issued by some little known organizations) if it wasn't for the obvious attempt to make them look like (old) NBTHK and NTHK papers at first glance. It is clear that they were made to deceive, and therefore details of the seals etc. are irrelevant.

 

Hi Guido,

 

You know far more about this than I do, but for me it begs the question of why go to all the trouble of faking the papers and not give the swords themselves a more attractive attribution that would inflate their price? 

 

Kind regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..., but for me it begs the question of why go to all the trouble of faking the papers and not give the swords themselves a more attractive attribution that would inflate their price?

 

Probably for the same reason that one finds many gimei of lesser known smiths on swords - people get more easily suspicious if it's a famous smith, and have a closer look at the papers as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Guido. I live in Japan and this was purchased here so chances are it was written here. It looks pretty typical for the scrawl employed in most documents I see. Also, as I get older my handwriting gets less beautiful, so maybe this is another reason. Does anyone have an example of these papers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Simon! :)

 

Since the link will not work forever, I'm posting the papers here for future reference.

 

Again, different outlay of the paper, different seal, different envelope, different paper (the one in the first post seems to be some kind of thick vat paper), different penmanship.

post-12-0-41461200-1480324166_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Piers, the 美術日本刀保存審査会 bijutsu nihontō hozon shinsakai (of wich nobody has heard before) and the 鉄砲刀剣研究会 teppō tōken kenkyūkai are two different entities. The latter is affiliated with he sword shop むさし屋 Musashiya in Ōsaka.

 

Musashiya’s website doesn’t give us any info on the person issuing the papers, 小林幸信 Kobayashi Yukinobu; however, it has been reported that he is a polisher, and a certain website dealer claims that he used to be an executive director of the NBTHK. I did some research, and he certainly wasn’t a director of the main branch (which the title implies), but I wasn’t able to either confirm or rule out his involvement with any of the local branches.

 

We are dealing here with two different topics: the (previously unheard of) organizations of the original topic, and a possible connection of the second paper with Musashiya (brought up by you, but for which I don’t see any evidence so far). Other than that, Musashiya, and the papers issued by Mr. Kobayashi, are not generally accepted by collectors in Japan.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the update Guido.

 

By the way, 門 問 words can often be shortened in that way by Japanese people, when the tick is central, a vertical cross. It is considered to be for strictly informal use.

http://m.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/detail/q12117973032

 

These short forms are to be distinguished from the Chinese tick which is placed in the gap up at the top left.

http://m.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/detail/q14129859884

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...