Jump to content

Help identifying symbol


Recommended Posts

Guest reinhard

Your links don't work properly. Why not post images directly? By the way, it's not much fun to be redirected to other pages (click-counters). Nothing personal, just something I wanted to say for a while anyway.

 

reinhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I tried to post the picture directly to the board but it doesn't seem to work, if somebody would like to give me some pointers on how to get them directly on the board I'm all ears. The symbol is on the nakago-mune of a tanto, and I'm trying to figure out what it means if anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help with the picture Brian, and I will try to save my images as a JPEG next time. Concerning the symbol, somebody definitely put this on the nakago-mune of this tanto intentionally, but the question is why? Could it be a family Mon?

 

Why can't you show the actual marks? It could be directons for hitting a family Mon... but without the stroke directions and other little indentations in the metal we are having to work through a Western mind filter here. Look at number 3 on this page:

http://www2.harimaya.com/sengoku/buke_km/buke_km5.html

This Mitsuboshi Mon was also used in an upside down version, so your drawing could... possibly... be the one stroke, with a direction arrow meaning 'faces up' on it??? This is a very long shot, though, as I've never heard of this being done!!! :lol:

 

PS Your signature may need to be reinstalled, Austin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a chance to ask some 'experts' this evening and one of them had an interesting story.

 

He said he has seen marks like this before on post Meiji swords, particularly on those produced by Hori...i? (He couldn't remember the smith's name) from Hokkaido who was in charge of producing lots of swords from the blown-up No.2 turret of the Mikasa which had come back for repairs from the Russian war. Many of these war swords were in fact made by the smith's disciples, and he had a system of codes so that he knew which disciple had made which blade. He asked if your tanto hahaba is thin, indicating it might be a navy blade.

 

PS One of the swordsmiths told me as an additon that the Nakago mune could be used for writing the name of the person for whom the sword was being made, the Tame-mei. It could also be used for practising inscribing a Mei, or even for completing a Mei when there was no more space left on the Nakago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said he has seen marks like this before on post Meiji swords, particularly on those produced by Hori...i? (He couldn't remember the smith's name) from Hokkaido who was in charge of producing lots of swords from the blown-up No.2 turret of the Mikasa which had come back for repairs from the Russian war. Many of these war swords were in fact made by the smith's disciples, and he had a system of codes so that he knew which disciple had made which blade. He asked if your tanto hahaba is thin, indicating it might be a navy blade.

The smith is Horii Hideaki.

 

Ref. Hideaki and Mikasa-to.

http://www.h4.dion.ne.jp/~t-ohmura/gunto_113.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good. Thank you that very interesting link.

 

So, I must have misunderstood what my friend was saying; it wasn't the Number 2 turret, but a 12 inch secondary gun turret.

 

Oh, and he mentioned that such swords are illegal in Japan. If you take one to the police and try to register it, they will confiscate it and cut it in pieces. Sometimes the pieces find their way back to katana kaji, but often they are disposed of as scrap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info guys, that is very interesting about Horii Hideaki's students signing with a code of sorts. I suppose it's possible that this blade could be by a student who hasn't yet gained the right to sign his own name? or has not yet chosen an art name so instead he signed with a code of sorts so his teacher can tell that this is his work, but of course IM just guessing. Any thoughts on that theory?

 

P. s The blade is not a post Meiji piece but appears to be at least ÅŒei and possible as old as late Kamakura.

 

Austin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...