Jump to content

Senior Civil Forestry Official's Dirk Or Dagger


Ed Hicks

Recommended Posts

The modern naval cadet dirks are comparable to the modern naval parade swords: the saya is always leather-covered and never same-covered.

 

If you look at the attached link, at 2:15 you will see an officer with the current dress sword (yes, this is a JMSDF fashion show! You really have to watch it to believe it!). It is vitulally identical to the old one, down to the sword knot. But the saya is always leather-covered. See also the attached picture.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRXA1mVk7HU

 

Furthermore, since the official use of dress weapons is very limited in nowadays' Japanese armed forces, I would be very surprised if civil forestry officials would get any.

post-3192-0-47354000-1467303512_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-306-0-58150500-1467336504_thumb.jpgThe complex situation involving these types of daggers is that there is so little information available.From my quest to answer this question I have run into quite a can of worms because most of the information is speculative.I think the answer will ultimately lie in the design on the metal fittings themselves such as the number of blossoms leaves and tendrils/buds.This photo is considered to be a Naval Cadets Dagger I have Highlighted some of the features for reference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a dagger I recently acquired from a good friend of mine which is also considered to belong to the forestry genre of daggers which closely resembles an illustration in the Fuller and Gregory book Japanese Military and Civil Swords and Dirks there are however,differences with the main one being a curved saya. Of note is the design on the back strap which has no retaining screw and the number of grip segments.Any theories or information would be appreciated.

 

post-306-0-74043000-1467337939_thumb.jpgpost-306-0-79107300-1467337949_thumb.jpgpost-306-0-20613200-1467337961_thumb.jpgpost-306-0-35063400-1467337971_thumb.jpgpost-306-0-42850400-1467337983_thumb.jpgpost-306-0-40828800-1467338003_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruce Pennington, on 01 Jul 2016 - 01:52 AM, said:

Any reason not to consider that it could just be in perfect condition because it sat in a shop during the war, or in someone's desk?

 

# Bruce: And also during the last 70 years. If it was the case, the aging of both the gilt and the same would have been slowed. However, in my experience, even very well protected from light and wear, gilt tends to become paler with age and leather tends to darken. Unless of course it is solid gold!

 

# Geoffrey: the naval dirk with a backstrap would be the first type (1873). From 1883, the backstrap was suppressed on naval dirks. However, the design was retained for some civilian administrative bodies, including forestry administration. The same happened with the naval flag rank sword: it was abolished for the Navy in 1914, but its hilt design was retained for higher ranks in colonial administration. These civilian administration dirks and Swords, apart from some specific floral ornaments that you pointed out, are virtually identical to the original early naval patterns from which they originate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly, but you are talking about high-quality swords that were fire-gilded using mercury, which was extremely efficient, albeit lethal to the craftsmen. Using this process, you can have old swords whose gilt remains quasi-perfect and very shiny.

 

On ordinary pièces, such as this one, electrical guilding would have been used. It is cheaper, healthier and efficient. The downside: it is not a durable as the mercury process and the gilding becomes less shiny when it ages, even kept from the sun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of interesting observations have been posted. The dagger I posted has not been refinished, is not a fanciful reproduction and I believe it is just an exceptional example of a pre 1945 dirk. I have not seen a reproduction of this model or any repro military daggers that approach the quality. This my opinion based on my research and experience, of course. I've owned many WWII era swords and daggers in better condition than this one. For comparison if anyone has seen a portion of Mike Quigley's collection you'll find many mint military mounts of the highest quality and near new condition. Ed

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only seen very bad attemps in copying Japanese navy dirks. All from China.

The are very easy to spot.

 

On that looks okay far away, is this one made in Japan. It does have made in Japan stamped on the seppa near habaki.

Close look and it stinks too, not ugly like does from China but newish and plastic like.

It has 2 spun wires on handle, it schould have been 1 spun and 2 straight.

post-1265-0-47852000-1468096147_thumb.jpeg

post-1265-0-04266800-1468096157_thumb.jpeg

post-1265-0-05157200-1468096168_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have owned many of these over the years and the one that started the thread look like a minty original to me.  I also think Geoff's is a nice original.   As Thomas mentioned there are many found in fine condition with all the gilding intact!  Condition has nothing to do with age and all to do with care and storage.  when judging these you have to look at quality and natural patina.  The last one posted is an example of the lack of quality the new ones have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...