Jump to content

Why do smiths not sign blades


bullpuppy

Recommended Posts

I sure there are many reasons. But when an unsigned blade is attributed to a well acknowledged smith via Shinsa and the smith signs other blades why didn't he sign all.

 

Some reasons that I made up:

 

1) The finished blade did not meet his standards

2) Perhaps he didn't want the blade traced to him. (maybe tax evasion)

3) The blade has been cut down and signature was lost.

4) Perhaps he exceeded his allowable quota

5) Superstition

6) a student made it with out the teachers knowledge but duplicated the style.

7) He needed to keep his identity hidden, perhaps making blades for the enemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I think in the days gone by a smith signing a sword would suggest that the sword belonged to him where in fact he was probably a subject of a lord or monastery so him not signing the bladed was resepectful if that makes sense....

 

I think that this is very much true for early Yamato blades where the early swordsmith schools were branches of monasteries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and I heard this other scenario from a Kyoto sword dealer ....... when a swordsmith gets chumon uchi (custom order) from high ranking offical, he usually produce two or three blades and present to his client. Client picks one and the swordsmith will engrave his signature while the remaining rejects are sold thru local sword dealers for extra bucks and the ended up as mumei.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that this is very much true for early Yamato blades where the early swordsmith schools were branches of monasteries.

 

I believe with Yamato baldes, many were favoured by the Warrior Monks and the Yamato smiths would not sign their works so their lords did not know who made them.

 

Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and I heard this other scenario from a Kyoto sword dealer ....... when a swordsmith gets chumon uchi (custom order) from high ranking offical, he usually produce two or three blades and present to his client. Client picks one and the swordsmith will engrave his signature while the remaining rejects are sold thru local sword dealers for extra bucks and the ended up as mumei.

 

Might be in the past, but I'm not sure it works this way today.

AFAIK good smiths refused "shadow blades" are... broken !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many early koto blades are unsigned as the practice was not "en-vogue." (I believe it was thought of as a little arrogant to sign one's work.)

 

You start seeing many signatures towards mid/end of kamakura on as the practice caught on. The sengoku period brought signing into fill swing as constant wars = demand for swords = smiths/schools putting a calling card on their blades. For example, there are many signed sukesada blades but that just meant it was made by a smith in the sukesada mon.

 

Another reason can be the smith is apprenticed to another smith. Good example would be gassan sadakatsu. He produced swords for years but did not sign them with his name until his father (sadakazu) died in 1918.

 

These are some reasons along with what's already been mentioned. Mumei does not necessarily mean low quality. In fact many masamune blades are unsigned as are blades by dozens of masters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...