Jump to content

DKR

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DKR

  1. 33 minutes ago, Jussi Ekholm said:

    . For monetary value the NBTHK appraisal can carry huge difference, for example depending what attribution the mumei sword gets...

    Mumei Blades are one side of the medal..........but even more important is it for signed Kodogu and for signed blades in the high end level !

    It can be very risky to put a lot of money in signed objekt of art without any guarantee that the Signatur is OK. 

    In the moment the only Papers which are more or less acceptable are the papers of the NBTHK.........in the high end level.

     

     

    But like Stefes87 wrote  :

    You pay a considerable load of dollars (especially for non-USD earners), the item disappears for a while, then it may come back with a paper that has been produced by an un-known quantity, using an un-known reference source (how old, how complete, how updated?).

     

    This exactly what i was something thinking by myself. 

    You want to know why it get not a paper or the item is rejected..as a fake.....Who can you ask ?

    Especially if you are a foreign collector................for blades it is maybe possible to ask Tanobe sensei........and for kodogu ?

     

    Who is in the Shinsa ?

    What is the profession of the members in the Shinsa ?

    Are they all studied and graduated Experts in their field ?

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  2. Georg ,

    Super ! 

    Das wäre dann definitiv ein absolutes Highlight diese Klinge in der realen Welt zu sehen.

    Ich freue mich jetzt schon.....

     

    Es gibt nur ein kleines "aber "

    Ich schreib dazu noch eine PM an Dich.

     

  3. Hmmm... it seems that you are right, thank you for your help.

     

    Unusual writing of this sign..........that's why I  was confused. 

    Unfortunately I found no information about a smith who might have use this "Name " with this Kanji.

     

    Anyway,  the blade,  a short Naginata-blade, is in a very bad condition.

    It make no sense to show it here.

  4. Send it to a shinsa in Japan and ask the real experts..........everything  else is useless.

    No-one here , or in another Internet forum is able to give you a 100% serios answer if the blade is genuine work from this smith or not.

     

    Of course you can get o lot of personal opinions .........or you try what " Jean "  write ......but the only serious way is over Japan and a shinsa team of serious experts in Japanese swords.

     

    And this is my own personal opinion 😄

  5.  The only positive aspect of a "Hozon"  paper with no information is : It is the opinion of the NBTHK that the objekt in the paper in genuine! 

     

    So not a Chinese or another fake ! 

    Sound funny , I know.....but I had a hard lesson learnd with a tsuba several years ago.

    I thought it was a old good original one.......no bullshit . It was a modern copy ....made as looking old.

     

    Just my two cent.....

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...