Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 Neutral


About masondj

  • Rank
    Chu Jo Saku

Profile Information

  • Location:
    New Zealand

Profile Fields

  • Name
  1. First blade at such quality, you'll gonna love it and enjoy it for a long time!
  2. A beautiful blade indeed, thanks for sharing!
  3. THanks for sharing it with us Guido, great job and beautiful daisho!
  4. You are quite right Ken, I've rotated the photo. And now the sugata tells the truth, isn't it? Can't trust what was written on the sayagaki Mason, how about posting shots of the sugata, with a completely-bare blade?
  5. the way it runs into the nakago makes you wonder
  6. When it comes to Koto blade, I guess the acceptable standards include more or less some forms of minor flaws in the not-too-pricey category.
  7. It's stated ubu on the sayagaki
  8. That's a major one for me too, Franco pointed out as well. But polishing could potentially hide a few more flaws.
  9. Here you go Ken, I came across it on ebay when I was doing research on Mihara group from Muromachi period. You can check out other photos here: https://www.ebay.com/itm/SAYAGAKI-Attested-Japanese-Antique-Wakizashi-Sword-Samurai-Katana-Nihonto/254558920128?_trksid=p2485497.m4902.l9144 It was sold just a few days ago for $890.
  10. Are these acceptable flaws on a wakizashi from Muromachi period (Mumei)? What do you think? I think Michael from the other post mentioned about the flaws from Muromachi deduct its value accordingly.
  11. All good Brandon, let me know when you get to them.
  12. I was just too late for the one you sold, saw the post only after the update it was sold.
  13. It sounds reasonable, just updated my budget to 1700.
  • Create New...