Jump to content

francois2605

Gold Tier
  • Posts

    395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by francois2605

  1. 1 hour ago, WellsFargo said:

    hamon which started with a straight line from before / under the hamachi and then gently progressed into gunome midare

     

    My 2 cents: the technical term for this is yakidashi.

     

    From Markus Sesko's Encyclopedia of Japanese Swords.

     

    Quote

    yakidashi (焼出し) The beginning of a hamon around the ha-machi. At unshortened blades, the hamon usually runs a little bit into the tang. There are different interpretations of this starting of the hamon and we basically distinguish between the following forms: sugu- yakidashi (直刃焼出し), straight start which turns after a more or less short distance into the “actual” hamon; saka-yakidashi (大坂焼出し), also starts straight or as gentle notare but the yakiba widens smoothly to turn into the “actual” hamon; Ky-yakidashi (京焼出し), the yakiba starts in suguha but turns then rather abruptly into the “actual” hamon; Mino-yakidashi (美濃焼出し), the yakiba starts with a koshi-ba; Satsuma-yakidashi (薩摩焼出し), term to refers to Satsuma-shintblades where the hamon starts like at most kotblades right away as midareba.

     

    image.thumb.png.bb058913a63de3396c9694de65f21720.png

    • Like 2
  2. 16 minutes ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

    Hi Ced, Mr Chua below would be worth contacting: https://www.kinghouse.sg/introduction

     

    How weird, I had a look to the "Military swords" collection and stumbled upon several eBay pictures from Komonjo and SamuraiMonkey.

     

    This (Komonjo) 1937 katana is supposedly by Yasunori... Obviously a fake but why is it there ?!? I'm so confused

    • Like 1
  3. Hello William, that's a nice Type 3 you have here. 

     

    Some minor remarks regarding your description:

     

    Shin-gunto refers to a type 94/98 koshirae, yours is a type 3.

     

    image.thumb.png.6249dc3a410c28203d438652f4410d06.png

     

    The sugata is shinogi-zukuri, iori-mune only describes the geometry of the sword's back.

     

    image.thumb.png.a6adbd3a8dc34334bc426809d7333159.png

     

    The nagasa is too long and cannot be correct, gunto normally have a length between 60 and 65 cm. You probably measured the total sword length which isn't the nagasa.

     

    image.png.906855fd3cebf7476a1a53880ccd1d86.png

  4. Your sword is gorgeous, it looks very powerful with its long kissaki.

     

    Are you alluding to a kinnoto in your description ? I remembered (from Aoi Arts pictures) that kinnoto had an extra long nakago (among other things) that I can't see on your sword so I checked Markus' encyclopedia of Japanese swords and I don't think your sword qualifies as one: the nagasa should be at least 80 cms and the nakago is too short (once you've seen a kinnoto nakago, you just can't forget it).  

     

    image.thumb.png.cf47ff6470b20ed389d362d5046c1aa5.png

    • Like 1
  5. Hello Erick and welcome to the board and this hobby :)

     

    Have you already removed the tsuka (handle) ? It would be helpful to see pictures of the nakago (tang) and if there is a mei (signature).

     

    At first glance, the hamon looks very nice. I also like the habaki with the 2 different metals (that's a good sign IMO).

     

    The tsuba is unusual for a shin-gunto, maybe that is a civil variant ? Others will be able to tell.

     

    If you remove the tsuka, you may find matching numbers on the tsuba, seppa (washers) and tang.

     

    The color of the sarute tells me it's not original to the koshirae.

     

    Edit: Bruce Pennington maintains a very useful reference document Stamps of the Japanese Sword listing the different types of stamps one can find on military swords.

×
×
  • Create New...