Jump to content

RichardP

Gold Tier
  • Posts

    202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RichardP

  1.  

     

      You fold the metal and it forms a radius which does not quite match the squared end of the nakago that you have filed leaving a very small gap that should be clearly visible running from mune to ha.  Not perhaps needle shaped but non the less visible.

    Ahhhh, the clouds are lifting! Something like so:
    (Now that makes sense! I imagined I could see a pinhole in the wall of the mekugi-ana; thanks for such a clear explanation, Geraint!)

    post-4728-0-29160000-1580413859_thumb.jpeg

  2. In Nakahara & Martin’s Facts and Fundamentals, their discussion of orikaeshi-mei (p.78) concludes with the observation that authentic examples are likely to exhibit a “clear needle-sized hole through the fold of the turned-back mei.” And sure enough, the photographic example on the next page (fig. 91) shows an inverted mei with what I assume to be the original mekugi-ana, in the wall of which is what appears to be a tiny needle hole...

    I’m unable to find any other mention of this phenomenon in the NMB “Search” function or the wider Interwebs. Is there any controversy as to the truth of this? What was the purpose of the hole? Was a wire placed into it prior to bending the mei? (I’m imagining something along the lines of filling a pipe with sand before bending it, to keep it from folding in on itself—but I can’t imagine why it would be necessary in this application.) Does the presence of a pinhole give an indication of when the orikaeshi-mei was performed?

    Thanks!

  3. Look up back button focus. That separates focus from other settings.

    Interesting—thanks, Barry!

    I’ve been trying your technique of focusing on a card, and then manually locking focus at that depth. Found a Bluetooth remote shutter for $10. The articles I’m finding on back-button focus seem geared towards DSLR cameras, though—is there a photo app you’re using that creates that function for iPhones?

     

    Thinking of firing up the old carbide caving lamp, it puts out some nice warm light...

     

    Cheers!

     

    Richard

    post-4728-0-45486000-1565999748_thumb.jpeg

  4. No, not o-suriage—just suriage. That’s the original mei on the katana, and whoever fashioned the tip for it in its new life as a wakizashi also shortened the bottom of the nakago to hide that it had once been a katana. So they had to raise the machi to compensate, and that’s why the shinogi goes weird there. But whoever did all that went out of their way to preserve the mei, figuring it was a sufficient selling point to compensate for it being on the wrong side...

    Am I way off base here?

    Regards,

    Richard

  5. Although logic says a hardened tip would break before bending, I have seen more than my fair share of healthy blades with identical tips. Have seen someone drop a sword point first on a carpet and it bent like that too, and another that curled.

    Can't explain why, but it can happen.

    Wow—I knew Nihonto was deep waters, but still, that’s amazing!

     

    I’m guessing Chris and Jason are correct and this wak was maybe fashioned from a broken katana, given the katana-mei, the inelegant nakago, the foldy tip and strange kissaki, and the boshi that resides only in my fond imagination... Even IF flipped coins do apparently land on their sides from time to time and the folding isn’t conclusive evidence of lack of hardening, when coupled with the other problems it doesn’t bode well, does it?

     

    Thanks for the input guys!

     

    Richard

  6. Hello All!

    A fellow online is selling this wakizashi and as he tells me he’s open to literally any offer, I thought I’d share his pictures here in hopes that some of you would share your impressions with me.

    Mr. Singer was kind enough to help me translate the mei—“Morihisa”.

    Even from the blurry photos I can see what look like some sizable ware, but most alarming of course is the tip, which appears to actually be folded back on itself. My initial thoughts were that this blade was either never properly heat-treated or had been through a fire or something, as no hardened steel would just fold like that.

    But then I remembered I know bugger-all about nihonto metallurgy and would do well to at least run it by youse guys before I simply dismissed the blade.

    Is there a ghost of a hamon visible? I think I can make one out in the close-up pictures, and it even looks like sufficient boshi that the damaged tip could be repaired with room to spare—but I still can’t get over that folded tip.

    Can’t make out any hada.

    The shape seems odd, too—like it started out shobu-zukuri and then someone decided to add a yokote. Hard to make out sugata or sori from these pictures...

    As far as the nakago goes, I can’t make out any yasurime—or maybe a hint of Kiri? The nakago-shinogi looks like it makes a little wiggle as it leaves the nakago, so, o-suriage (and I’m just imagining the yasurime?) The nakago-jiri makes me think o-suriage as well...

    And I’m puzzled that this wakizashi is signed katana-mei. The only Morihisa I can find are not Hizen smiths, so what’s his name doing on the wrong side of the blade? The patina seems pretty good at least, right?

    There could be big ol’ hagire all through this thing, of course. But it would be a looong car-ride to get it in hand—and I just can’t get over that folded tip...

    Thank you All so much for being so generous with your expertise!

    Regards,

    Richard

    post-4728-0-10776800-1557358041_thumb.jpeg

    post-4728-0-93748500-1557358060_thumb.jpeg

    post-4728-0-36594200-1557358074_thumb.jpeg

    post-4728-0-44784100-1557358089_thumb.jpeg

    post-4728-0-03401600-1557358112_thumb.jpeg

  7. Outside of Japan, you can work with a place like Nihonzashi, in Florida. It’s a Battodo dojo + traditional martial arts store. They sharpen modern production blades.

    Within Japan, there are no Chinese made shinken, so it’s just a matter of getting a lower grade polish on a shinsakuto, which is no problem. There’s no shortage of tameshigiri practice over there, so it’s a common need.

    Interesting—thank you, Michael!

    Richard

  8. In the case of a nihonto that is pre-Meiji, it's essentially a question of quality and whether or not the risks/wear and tear to the sword inherent in the practice of Iai/kenjutsu outweigh its intrinsic value and potential preservation. For example, swords used for tameshigiri do need to be sharpened periodically, which as we all know, shortens the life of the sword. It's essentially a consumable.

     

    This leads me to wonder, how does one go about getting a non-art sword sharpened? (I am assuming that togishi who polish art swords don’t spend their time putting fresh edges on Chinese-made shinken...?)

    Thanks,

    Richard

  9. Hello All-

    Just stumbled over this interesting podcast, don’t see that it’s been mentioned here before

    http://samuraipodcast.com

    Of particular interest was Episodes 43 and 44, “Samurai Armor: An Interview with Trevor Absolon”:

    http://samuraipodcast.com/ep43-samurai-armor-an-interview-with-trevor-absolon-part-1

    He reappears for Episodes 51 and 52, “Shady Ethics in the Japanese Antique Armor Trade”:

    http://samuraipodcast.com/ep51-shady-ethics-in-the-Japanese-antique-armor-trade-p1

    Regards,

    Richard

    • Like 1
  10. Hello All,

    This just popped up on my local Craigslist—never seen gunto mounts with a tsunagi and I wonder where the blade is living now?

    Anyway, the leather looks good to me but I am very ignorant of all things gunto. Is this a Type 98? Is it an example worthy of scooping up ($200), or would you all give it a pass?

    I’ve been looking for similar examples online, but have had a hard time finding gunto koshirae that doesn’t include a blade as well...

    Thank you!

    Richard

    post-4728-0-37770500-1554384951_thumb.jpeg

    post-4728-0-07826400-1554385354_thumb.jpeg

  11. Hello All-

    Thanks for this great site!

    Would someone be kind enough to share their knowledge of how the process of assigning titles to swordsmiths worked?

    From the threads here, and some great articles over at Mr. Sesko’s site, my understanding is that the process began early in the Shinto period and consisted of a Kyoto bureaucracy that awarded titles to smiths upon request, provided the smith was suitably accomplished (and paid a fee).

    Is the above generally correct?

    Were the names just plucked out of the air by whichever official was in charge at the time? (For instance, why would a Hizen smith be awarded the title of “Ise Daijo”, when Ise wasn’t even on the same island? Were distant areas chosen intentionally—something akin to “his name is known as far away as Ise Province?)

    I got the impression from one article—my apologies, I haven’t been able to find it to link to it—that the process became more cynical and corrupted as time went on, and that titles eventually came to signify little other than a smith’s marketing acumen...?

    Thanks again!

×
×
  • Create New...