Jump to content

jct3602

Members
  • Posts

    170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Coos Bay, Oregon USA
  • Interests
    Reading, Bridge, Research

Profile Fields

  • Name
    john c .twineham

Recent Profile Visitors

455 profile views

jct3602's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

50

Reputation

  1. jct3602

    Meiji copy?

    Laser cut and sandcasting seems very likely (also, upon inspection, lack of oxidation in middle of interior surfaces of cuts); on opposite surface there is a little fuchi wear, but not enough for any real age. For 9,050 yen before fees, worth it for study. Thickness might also indicate very young; the Edo period tosho and katchushi tsuba were all thicker. Wonder if in that era the common .5 cm thicknesses was the result of buying factory produced iron/steel plate, then working it. Thanks to all of the responders; Happy New Year! John Twineham
  2. Follow-up picture of alteration. Full tsuba on side with the one alteration is over 3mb. John Twineham
  3. Thought you might like the following - 17 petal, with the upper one on one side altered from 17 to 18 petals. The theory my teacher had was this was an Imperial reward to Mori Motonari, who financed the Imperial ascension ceremonies around 1560, and the one mon altered to 18 petals was to show no assumption of imperial dignities or ongoing rights to use the imperial mon which was granted by the Emperor he aided. That alteration, 2 petals removed and 3 inserted, was certainly done after the original creation of the tsuba. Markus Sesko says that the 17 petal was an urba legend. Unfortunately, the reverse side was too large, so I will try to diminish it, or at least the altered portion, in a follow up.
  4. jct3602

    Meiji copy?

    Just received nice tsuba with sukashi butterfly motif through JAUCE. 8 cm diameter, .336 cm rim, .263 interior, listed as 90 grams. Rim very thin, but protrudes evenly on both sides above the interior thickness. Condition looks too good for an old piece (possibly even younger then Meiji), but it is thinner than I would expect for a post Koto katchushi tsuba. Has some spots where you can finger roll what looks like lacquer (probably just stickum from a price tag, lol). Question is whether during Meiji did they revert to reproductions that were closer in thickness to pre Edo pieces? Also, the presence of 3 dots for antenna, etc. rather than 2 seems to fit younger pieces, although I have seen a picture of one supposedly early ko-tosho with 3 dots. Educational input welcome! John Twineham
  5. Just acquired a pair of large menuki (5.8 x 1.7 x .25 cm) on a Higo style tsuka; would appreciate any opinions as far as origin, etc. They appear to be mercury/gold amalgam on a fairly pale shibuichi; level of detail leads my thoughts to production after the introduction of Dutch optics. Apologies for the difference in lighting of the photos. Opinions/comments/thoughts welcome. John Twineham
  6. Thank you very much for your help. An accurate description of the tsuba.
  7. Would appreciate translation assistance; appears to be a collector's opinion. Yours, John C. Twineham
  8. jct3602

    heianjo style

    Just curious as to thoughts about period, since so many heianjo-ish tsuba were produced. this one came cheaply; the seller's picture made it look bad. With some careful cleaning by a friend of mine, much improvement, and the inferior looking side actually is better now than the one the seller choose to display. Small picture before, the other 2 as is now. 7.14x7.14 cm; .41 rim, .38 seppa thickness. john twineham
  9. jct3602

    Early Akasaka?

    Thanks Curran - I did not have anything to link the carving to, and that was puzzling me, so I think you are right. Have not seen enough examples of Akasaka to know how prevalent carving is. john
  10. jct3602

    Early Akasaka?

    7.62x7.30 cm - .51 cm rim, .55 cm seppa john twineham
  11. jct3602

    Daisho?

    8.01x7.65x.69 cm and 7.56x7.12x.58 cm. the DAI is feels about 30% heavier than the SHO.
  12. jct3602

    Daisho?

    I apologize for not thanking all the responders earlier! My bad; got distracted and forgot (old age) about this post (and the lead up and follow up to SF tokenkai). As atonement, another daisho, put together at that show. Noticed one on a table and realized I had looked at something like it very recently on JAUCE, so picked it up and lucked out on the other. Interesting that the sort of necesary small differences involve one with chisel marks arcing clockwise, the other one has them going counterclockwise. john
  13. jct3602

    Fake patina?

    Thanks Ford: I agree; something with real age and made with uniformity of metal, consistent patina, and little or no corrosion would seem impossible; modern metal with an interesting patination process could easily be the case, so Occam's Razor rules. Would appreciate your opinion on the following if you would; Edo? pictures taken outdoors in sunlight. Yours, John
  14. jct3602

    Fake patina?

    Very good point Grey, and one that I had wondered about. As an alternative, if you look at the depression opposite the kozuka hitsu, it looks like the piece was hammered thinner, possibly to spread out and thus compress the nakago hitsu. Since it is only .2 cm thick, perhaps the feeling was that chiselling divots in would not do very much and be risky, the same with copper inserts that might get easily dislodged. Just a random thought. Michael Bell says that the depression was certainly an intentional hammer stroke, not a bruise. Thanks again! John
  15. jct3602

    Fake patina?

    Thank you both! You may be quite correct. I was suspicious, but not about waxing, more about a really good late period patinating solution; the reason why I tried to give a shot that showed some of the wall of the sukashi cuts was with that thought in mind. I just left a message with Michael Bell, who primarily makes swords but also tsuba, etc., and asked about the waxing. He and his lead apprentice both have seen the item in hand, and did not mention wax, but I did not ask. They both did say it had a wonderful patina. I have 2 more available resources to show it to who might have some thoughts; one will be next weekend (Stephen Strauch), so will fill you in when I get Michael's response, and later when Stephen sees it in hand. Once again, thank you. john twineham
×
×
  • Create New...