Jump to content

Lee Bray

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    827

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Lee Bray

  1. Fuchi mei

    in Translation Assistance

    Posted

    This mei is on the side of a silver fuchi.

    It is not in my possession but I have the owners permission to post this and ask for a translation.

    Using Self & Hirose, I get the first kanji as (1196) Sei, Jo or Mori, the second kanji as (1028) Min and the third as (838) Mura.

    This makes no sense to me so I hope someone can clarify the translation.

    Thanks in advance.

     

    post-419-14196876054268_thumb.jpg

  2. Yokoyama Sukesada

    in Translation Assistance

    Posted

    I've been attempting to translate this for a chap on another forum but I failed on a couple of kanji.

    I have the owners permission to post this pic and ask for a complete translation.

    I managed to get Yokoyama Kozuke Daijo X X Sukesada.

    Thanks for any help.

     

    post-419-14196876049897_thumb.jpg

  6. Help with translation on tanto blade

    in Translation Assistance

    Posted

    Hi t1mpani

     

    When Chris says fake signature, he means gimei, not a fake blade.

    The Japanese have added fake signatures(gimei) to swords for centuries: sometimes to deceive, sometimes as a dedication, sometimes because it was Wednesday...

     

    Higashiyama ju Yoshihira was a high level smith that worked at the end of the 1500's, early 1600's.

    Clearly your blade is not from that period so it is safe to say that Yoshihira did not make your blade, hence the gimei call.

    As I said in the BF thread, this is likely a WW2 piece, probably shortened (please note I didn't say 'actually') from a longer sword that had been damaged or had a flaw.

    With the chippy mei style which is common in WW2 mei, and that it is signed on the blade itself, I'd say this is just a 'nod of the hat' to the older smith as opposed to a signature intended to deceive.

  7. A tanto tsuba kantei

    in Tosogu

    Posted

    Some Tanaka school tsuba use gold on their sekigane. A simple google search will show that.

    To say that sekigane never had gold on them is wrong.

    These sekigane show on the inside of the ana if you look carefully.

    I also see crosshatching under the gold 'splotches'- nunome zogan.

    Seems to be slight wear in the seppa dai area from mounting.

    Surface iron doesn't look cast to me.

     

    I think this tsuba has been denigrated prematurely.

    I agree the mei is a little funky looking but nothing else strikes me as fake.

     

    Late Edo, maybe later, copy of a Tanaka school tsuba.

  9. its raining gendaito!

    in Auctions and Online Sales or Sellers

    Posted

    Not saying they are. But just hypothetically speaking, I think it is funny that if you had a modern smith create these, and sign them with a unique name, and then mount them in modern repro koshirae, market them and sell them openly as high end modern custom swords, made to order...you would probably fetch considerably more than these sell for. Just saying....

     

    I think you are wrong, hypothetically.

    Unless you have made your name over some time selling quality steel, modern swords go for very little.

    A couple of the best names like Howard Clark and Antony DiCristofano seem to sell with regularity but most sit on their stock for some time.

    The most active sword forum around is SBG which deals mostly with swords swords below US$300, fully mounted.

    Chinese forges are knocking them out by the hundreds.

    One of the most popular low end, fully mounted functional swords sells for US$80!

    US$80!

    (repeated for effect)

    Even custom swords from Chinese forges are selling for a few hundred as opposed to thousands.

    I think a skillful Chinese smith would welcome the chance to create some slightly better swords for this dubious market.

     

    Just look at the nakago on these pieces... my H.Clark and modern Chinese katana have more patina on them and they are just several years old. These nakago that Adrian linked to were filed and stamped last week.

  17. Do you use your nihonto for tameshigiri?

    in General Nihonto Related Discussion

    Posted

    If anyone has a burning desire to cut bamboo, we have plenty of it growing wild.

    If you want to cover my time and shipping, I'd be happy to chop some down and send it on.

    From arrow bamboo of up to 1cm thick to timber bamboo of up to 15cm thick(hard to come by), we have most varieties.

    Common type is around 3cm to 5cm and has two varieties; thick wall ~ 8mm and thin wall ~4mm.

    Unsure on maximum shipping lengths but 4ft should at least be doable as I've shipped 4ft packages before.

     

    Just a thought in case anyone was interested.

  19. From 'Tokubetsu Kicho paper' to 'Hozon'

    in Nihonto

    Posted

    This also applies to Lee and his case, and with the noted discrepancies, would Lee have any sympathy, which would allow him to re-submit and get a better result? or is there not an appeal procedure?

     

    I have no problem with the modern NBTHK system and have happily sent in swords for hozon papers but resubmitting the Shigetaka would be pointless as it is gimei.

    Removing the mei is an option but not a cheap one, especially with both sides of the nakago needing to be worked on.

     

    As it is, I'll keep it as a good example of why you buy the sword, not the papers.

  21. From 'Tokubetsu Kicho paper' to 'Hozon'

    in Nihonto

    Posted

    Hi Lee?

     

    I too find your posting interesting, and would like to follow up on this, but just a small point!. If the original post on the papers was yours, would you be kind enough to point where the post is located. If you are asking, for members to prove your point, and comment, then the reference would be a nice gesture.

     

    regards

    Denis.

     

    Sorry it went unanswered...different time zones and sleep.

    I'm confused (possibly by the question mark after my name). I'm not asking members for their opinion on my sword, I'm just presenting it as evidence that kicho papers are not worth the time spent discussing them. I referred Geraint to a search because he sounded interested in Shigetaka but I didn't have the link to hand and I was pressed for time.

     

    Given the doubt around kicho papers, my initial point is I wouldn't trust what they said. In your position, I would not believe the Kanetane attribution and would submit for hozon.

    If a low ranked smith such as Shigetaka 6th gets fake papers it raises too many questions on the integrity of the whole system.

    At least it does for me, but then I bought the blade based on the advice of buying polished, papered blades so now I'm rather jaded on kicho papers. ;)

  22. From 'Tokubetsu Kicho paper' to 'Hozon'

    in Nihonto

    Posted

    Hi Geraint.

    There are pics of the mei and papers somewhere on this board if you do a search.

    The blade is dated to 1663 and part of the mei says roku dai, or sixth generation, yet the nidai worked in that time period and the 6th worked in 1740's.

    Because of the time difference, I sent hi-res pics of the mei and date to a couple of dealer associates in Japan and both thought it gimei.

     

    Good questions regarding the reasoning behind the gimei/papers. I've never understood it myself.

  23. From 'Tokubetsu Kicho paper' to 'Hozon'

    in Nihonto

    Posted

    I have an Echizen Shigetaka 6th gen in Japanese polish from a dealer in Japan with kicho papers and it is gimei.

    The kicho papers are genuine but not worth the paper they're printed on.

     

    If I had a mumei sword with kicho papers, I would send it for Hozon just because I have zero faith in kicho papers.

×
×
  • Create New...