Jump to content

Alex A

Gold Tier
  • Posts

    5,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Posts posted by Alex A

  1. When you look around at other collectables, then look back towards Japanese sword collecting and papering then it strikes you as bit of an oddity 

     

    I'm not aware of any other antique arms collecting where such a papering system is involved.

     

    Example. .......Antique pistols can be an utter headache and your on your own. Yes there are forums and dealers may offer a certificate but they are to be taken with a pinch of salt. They don't add any value whatsoever, just some reassurance for some buyer not in the know.. 

     

    There is so much uncertainty with Japanese swords, especially mumei.  I'm not big on relying on other folks opinions about what i own, as we all know its not factual.

     

    So you end up with attribution, they think so and so made it..

     

    I bet an awful lot out there is attributed wrongly, we have all heard of contradictions.

     

    I find old mumei swords without papers, without attributions somewhat more interesting. 

     

    The blades im interested in now don't need them, quite liberating. 

     

    Japanese swords seems to be one hell of a unique hobby!!

     

    Anways, gone off on one again, just thinking out loud;-)

     

     

     

     

    .

     

     

    • Like 1
  2. Hi Paz, when i mentioned swords that don't need papers i was thinking of the swords that are obvious what they are. Your signed and dated Sue Bizen, Signed Sue Mino etc

     

    Then one could jump on to unsigned Sue Bizen etc, why bother paying someone to tell you what for the most of the time is clearly obvious or with a little effort, worked out.

     

    Other stuff like Edo ubu mumei. Say you come across a sword thats obviously Hizen with Konuka hada etc, why pay someone to tell you what can be worked out. Other mumei like Shinto Ishido etc etc etc

     

    As said earlier, some folks are happy enough with their own working out, seems like there's an obsession with getting things papered.

     

    Sometimes its just a waste of money, other times not.

     

    On occasion folks must hold one of their signed blades thinking wow, signed and made by the man himself, unaware that he had no hand in its making or signing.

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. You know what, sometimes when books/folks talk about mei you would think they were talking about mass produced machine stamped, like Sam Colt stamped on a pistol or something.

     

    Even with those you see oddballs where someone did something assways, human nature, worn punch etc.

     

    So when you add the human handcrafted/inscription into the equation then i guess that opens up many doors for discrepancies over a long period of time with much unknown thrown in for good measure.

     

    Someone once said to me, you would need a time machine.

     

     

  4. When everything about the sword matches that of the smith/school but the mei is SLIGHTLY off.

     

    Don't know about you but that sets me off on a whole world of speculation as to why that may be the case.

     

    Busy forge, Dai mei etc.

     

    Must be a number of authentic swords noted as gimei. 

     

    Many rational reasons why but guess they have to have boundaries.

     

    Could live with such a sword, probably wouldn't be too bothered about sending it to shinsa. Though obviously price would have to reflect lack of papers, for potential re-sale.  Some folks rely on papers for every blade they own, for one reason or another.

     

     

     

    • Thanks 1
  5. Nothing wrong with an educated punt, good luck with that.

     

    There are folks that are happy enough owning swords without papers, confident of their own knowledge enough so they don't need another opinion.

     

    Think certainly there are swords that don't need papers

     

    It is interesting to meet different folks with differing opinions regarding papers

  6. Hi i was referring the images above my comment, the little oval defect appeared to be a dint, to my eyes.

     

    Bottom picture, left at first glance appears to be some difference, darkness, possibly core steel beginning to show.

     

    On old swords, acceptable in moderation.

     

    Can expect stuff like this on very old swords, part of the reason that got me more interested in Shinsakuto.

     

    • Like 1
  7.  

    All i will say is that i think i have seen more Tadayoshi gimei pass through here than any other smith name,

     

    You see some on blades that are obviously Hizen but the mei looks real bad.

     

    Others on blades that look more Sukesada.

     

    People always say "buy the blade, not the papers", but there's a time when they are needed, from what I've seen.

     

     

    • Like 1
  8. Think it may have been an ishido sword.

     

    Anyways, yes it happens.  

     

    Possibly more on blades with more exaggerated curve when shortened, never really thought about it

     

    Not a great example below, but get the idea. The one mentioned above cut a lot more of the mei off.

    IMG_0696.jpeg

    • Like 1
  9. To me, judging by the nakago it looks old, not Shinshinto.

     

    Ana appear old and the varying surface to the nakago appears genuine. From what ive seen of most Shinshinto trying to be Koto, they never pull it off that good.

     

    Cant really tell from those images but looks to be Mitsu Mune, so taking that in plus the hada etc id be looking to see if it fits a shortened Muromachi Shimada sword or any others.

     

    Good luck with your research and possible purchase.

×
×
  • Create New...