Jump to content

Kantei Referance Book


Recommended Posts

hi guys,  hope every ones Xmas was great.

 

i have jus got yet another good book from Marus Sesko called  "KANTEI REFERACE BOOK of hamon and boshi. i must say the amount of oshigata is great.

 

but i must say i think the books above my skill level in identiying complicated hamon styles at this point.

 

so just asking if any other membes have this book and have used it in kantei's yet?. an you give me points or hints to get the most out of the book, as the same smiths can be spread across the book, pages apart and under differant hamon sections

 

kind regards Hamish

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Hamish, I collect shinshinto and use following books

 

Shinto & Shinshinto Kantei ( Markus)

Index of Japanese Swordsmiths ( Markus)

Kantei reference Hamon & Boshi ( Markus)

Nihon Shin-Shinto shi (Markus)

Nihonto Koza Shinshinto ( Afu Watson Transl.)

Shin shinto taikan (Iimura)

 

Best

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an index or easily usable table of contents? Sounds like you almost need a separate index sheet or guide to get the most value from it.

 

That the problem I have with the book. The lack of index. Basically, what you have to do is Kantei the Hamon and Boshi you have in front of you, then go to the book and check those that look like yours. It’s not the easiest way to proceed. It really is a kantei book more than a reference book. Still, great because of the amount of oshigata.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with that. I think that this book only comes handy at the end... if you can use it, because if the sword you’re working on isn’t the typical sword made by the smith, then the book is useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Jacques is absolutely right. Kantei should always start with sugata. The late Dr. Compton wrote extensively about this in an essay published in the 100 masterpieces book published by Sotherbeys. The shape can tell you a great deal and is generally (certainly not always) a more consistant element than either hamon or boshi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im more aiming at the difference smith issue, with smiths in the shinshinto area working in more then 1 tradition being listed in multiple sections. if you slightly mi-identify the hamon style, you will be looking in the wrong area. "easy for me" to do.

 

the book seems confusing, example kotetsu is listed over 4 pages,  none consecutively.  are Shinto smiths being listed before koto smiths?? etc.

 

im sure theres a system or method, im just not seeing it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The system is listed in the first page, really. It’s basically how would you describe your Hamon/Boshi, then go to the relevant pages. If the swordsmith used different types, he’ll be listed in different sections. Again I think it lacks an index where you would know on which pages a particular swordsmith is referenced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact all these kantei elements are linked and the first step (sugata) must be confirmed by the second step hada and so on.

 

For multiple reasons, sugata on its own can be very misleading. If you remember the chronological table of Japanese swords sugata from Heian to Meiji, all swords are ubu. Most of swords available for Kantei in Western countries are (for Heian to Nambokucho) O suriage, this can kill the sugata being the first step to kantei.

 

Concerning the Kantei, if I remember well, Mike Y could confirm, one of the best NBTHK Kantei contest winner has learned hundreds of hamon

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an index or easily usable table of contents? Sounds like you almost need a separate index sheet or guide to get the most value from it.

Next to my Japanese sword for connesiours(sp?), Marks Kantei reference is my go to. It's basically just a large collection of multiple Hamon/Ha and Boshi from many different smiths.

 

I use it for comparison to try narrowing down smiths by slowly examining each page. Sometimes I'll just look for fun to see all the different variations of intricate patterns.

 

If only for a nice Nihonto book full of hundreds of different hamon/ Boshi, you really can't beat it. The time it took must have been years or decades to get all of them in one book

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...