Jump to content


Photo

Light Weight 98

katana

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 IJASWORDS

IJASWORDS

    Jo Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 892 posts
  • LocationNSW AUSTRALIA

Posted 11 December 2019 - 01:15 PM

Not often seen, the light weight '98. Normal length, everything else miniaturized. Blade is chrome plated, and obviously used for parade or office use. The tsuba is pierced, and no locking mechanism. This one had the blue/brown tassel (now stored away for safe keeping). 

Attached Thumbnails

  • a19.jpg
  • a20.jpg

  • Brian, Navy, dwmc and 6 others like this
Neil

#2 Bruce Pennington

Bruce Pennington

    Sai Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 2,113 posts
  • LocationColorado

Posted 11 December 2019 - 03:45 PM

Neil,
Here's mine. A little worse for wear than yours. I haven't studied these, and am only famiiar, in passing so to speak, but I feel like I read that the chroming was an "early" experiment attempting to protect from rust? But dropped fairly quickly, reasons not explained. I'll try to find the reference to that, unless someone else can come up with it.

But I put the issue to you - do you have a sense of dating on these? Were they early (late '30s) or were they being produced throughout the war?

20170731_191554.jpg 20170731_191634.jpg 20170731_191819.jpg 20170731_191853.jpg 20170813_130125.jpg
  • Dave R, Shamsy and Smee78 like this

#3 Ontario_Archaeology

Ontario_Archaeology

    Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 126 posts
  • LocationOntario, Canada

Posted 11 December 2019 - 05:04 PM


Unfortunately this is the only image I have of mine. Since I'm away from my collection i can't take more.

Cool topic,
Matt

Attached Thumbnails

  • IMG_20190804_223426.jpg
  • IMG_20190824_113712_629.jpg

  • Dave R, Shamsy and Smee78 like this
Matt H.

#4 Dave R

Dave R

    Jo Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 784 posts

Posted 11 December 2019 - 08:14 PM

Neil,
Here's mine. A little worse for wear than yours. I haven't studied these, and am only famiiar, in passing so to speak, but I feel like I read that the chroming was an "early" experiment attempting to protect from rust? But dropped fairly quickly, reasons not explained. I'll try to find the reference to that, unless someone else can come up with it.


 

 

 The problem with chromed blades is that as soon as they are sharpened all the advantages are lost. Breaking the chrome skin opens up the underlying steel to the possibility of corrosion, and not just on the edge, but running under the chrome, damaging the blade and causing the chrome to flake off. The bare steel edge also looks ugly contrasting with the bright chrome.

 It's something you see a lot with early 20th century Western Military blades, and when I see such on the table at an arms fair, I leave them there. Early chrome plate was not like the current beast,  a lot more is now known about the long term effects, and more done to mitigate them.


  • Navy and Shamsy like this

Dave


#5 WilBru5

WilBru5

    Chu Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 47 posts
  • LocationU.S.A.

Posted 11 December 2019 - 08:39 PM

Looks great Neil


Bruce W.

 

Tho the world is shrouded in darkness, the gloom is oft pierced by illuminating shafts of light.

But while some seek out the light and radiate forth its glow.  Others lash out in rage and frustration at their own refusal to see...


#6 PNSSHOGUN

PNSSHOGUN

    Sai Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 1,995 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 11 December 2019 - 11:20 PM

Just how much lighter are they compared to a regular Type 94/98?


John


#7 Shamsy

Shamsy

    Jo Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 890 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 12 December 2019 - 12:17 AM

You're correct, Bruce. Nick did provide details of 95 blades being chromed as a measure to protect the sword until it was distributed for use. I don't have my documents with me to offer more than that.

I think there was a discussion about these swords on the forum before. I cannot remember specifics, but the view was that they may have been for officers outside of combat roles who wanted the status symbol without the bulk and weight of a combat sword. Perhaps that is why it is chrome plated.

Great sword, Neil! I had the opportunity to purchase a lightweight gunto maybe..... 10 or 11 years ago for $800AUD. I didn't thought, which in some ways was a shame, but I'd probably have just sold it off anyway.
  • Dave R likes this
Steve
Collecting Type 95 NCO swords

#8 PNSSHOGUN

PNSSHOGUN

    Sai Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 1,995 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 12 December 2019 - 01:11 AM

They crop from time to time, certainly a niche part of collecting though. The Type 94 example Matt shared is a real gem.
  • Dave R likes this

John


#9 IJASWORDS

IJASWORDS

    Jo Jo Saku

  • Members
  • 892 posts
  • LocationNSW AUSTRALIA

Posted 12 December 2019 - 01:38 AM

The light weight is about half the weight of a normal '98. 

Re chrome plating the blade, as the sword was never intended for combat use, it would never be sharpened. The chrome would negate  cleaning and oiling. Also in a parade environment, a drawn sword for a salute with a chrome  blade would look shiny and clean.


  • Dave R, Bruce Pennington and PNSSHOGUN like this
Neil





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: katana

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

IPB Skin By Virteq