Jump to content

WWII bring back - ID help


alamo

Recommended Posts

I’ll concur about the remounting from kyu gunto. Hard to say about the date. Tank makes me go with Chris while the almost muji Hada makes me support David’s theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True Bruce, I am not doubting this guy, glad he has come here to learn. Just making a general comment on provenance.

 

It is a good reminder (especially for guys like me!).

 

Quite a beautiful blade! These older blades continue to amaze me that they maintain their shine and beauty for hundreds of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Late reading through this, but used these pegs recently, for anyone interested.https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2-tapered-bamboo-meguki-sword-peg-Shinken-katana-iaido-Iaito-Japanese-sword/112007881291?hash=item1a1430a24b:g:ysQAAOSw2gxYy9sg

 

Bit of sanding, job done

  

 I make my own, either from bamboo spatulas, or bamboo knitting needles either of which gives you a decent thick strong piece to work with. If I was cutting I would get the smoked bamboo from Namikawa. I cut them to a basic shape, and then put them in a drill chuck and file them down as they rotate, which gives a nice round section to them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided not to take the Habaki off.  It didn't want to come off easily and there seems to be a split in it - I just moved it back as far as it would go. See the picture. 

 

Pictures of the blade are the same, just different sizes.

post-4959-0-72402600-1557958623_thumb.jpg

post-4959-0-35526700-1557958633_thumb.jpg

post-4959-0-01939100-1557958644_thumb.jpg

post-4959-0-38381300-1557958662_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if that Habaki is original to the blade. Looks way too small, hence the split.

 

 This could be the case especially if it's a "bitser", however habaki often look as if they're splitting (usually on older blades) when they are not. A proper habaki, unlike the Chinese fakes and repro's is two pieces, the second piece being the machi-gane which supports the ha-machi from below. Some habaki have the ha split to accommodate the edge, and some are not. I prefer the kind without a split as I think it provides better protection for the delicate ha-machi, but the slit type give a nicer, snugger profile to the habaki at the ha.

post-2218-0-51629000-1557996419_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I would say this is a koto blade or early shinto.

 

 

 

Thanks Chris.  I'm not familiar with the various time periods.  I did find the below.   Which ones would you be referring to?

 

  • early Koto 初古刀 938 ~ 1319,
  • middle Koto 中古刀 1319 ~ 1460,
  • late Koto 末古刀 1460 ~ 1596,
  • Keigen-Shinto 慶元新刀 1596 ~ 1624,
  • Kanei-Shinto 寛永新刀 1624 ~ 1658,
  • Kambun-Shinto 寛文新刀 1658 ~ 1684,
  • Genroku-Shinto 元禄新刀 1684 ~ 1764,
  • early Shinshinto 初新々刀 1764 ~ 1818,
  • middle Shinshinto 中新々刀 1818 ~ 1854,
  • late Shinshinto 末新々刀 1854 ~ 1868,
  • Gendaito 現代刀 1868 ~ today.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...