Jump to content

Old Sukashi


vajo

Recommended Posts

Dear Christoph,

 

i am not personally convinced, it is that old....?

 

if i do remember me well ? i have seen it already in past....

 

i actually can not point it...sorry....i but do strong guess for a "in spee" Owari or a "sideshow" -Shoami tradition here...

 

it is a nice Tsuba eitherway...but not old....maybe around the 18´s...?

( many points do not congrue...)

 

sorry...i just can not remember me where i have seen it already.....

 

eitherway-

 

nice! definitely!

 

me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Christian,

 

it comes from the an auction

 

Its a early piece that was made at the time the Tosho plates change to the first sukashi.

 

The pictures are not really good, i was so excited after unboxing and made it fast yesterday night with my Handy.  :laughing:

 

For myself I'm sure it is old.

 

Best 

 

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, Steven you are right.

Maybe I'm the only fool that see here a nice wabi sabi themed tsuba. The color from the desk lamp makes to much red, but i wouldn't build up the kamera yet. I think all from the tsuba could be seen. But its not a problem, I have it and I'm lucky  :clap:

 

:beer:  :beer:

Cheers

 

Chris

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to get the auction catalogue. There is one in a antique bookstore in berlin. I wrote him a email but he didn't answer yet. Not to speak that he wants some money for the catalogue. So i hope he will go down a little in price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, to keep some balance here. I am in the camp of doubters.

 

1. Collection provenance says only that the item came from a particular collection. Many a collection had duds (I can think e.g. of an awful Yamakichibei fake in Rosin's collection)

2. There has been a revival period in Japanese tosogu (and swords). Many a "Yamakichibei" has beed more or less well faked. Many were great pieces (like the ones made by the Futagoyama) but combined just too many features of several generations of Yamakichibei masters. This applies to other Owari/Kanayama tsuba.

3. Your tsuba looks like if someone said "let's go for wabi here" and then went full Monty. It is overdone, with no restraint - this is very unlike old tsuba. Please compare it with Owari examples from Sasano. There is a huge difference. 

4. Seppa dai is odd. 

 

To sum up - I believe this is a "revival" piece, made in the late Edo period, or even a younger piece. It does not strike me as particularly well done, although it is not quite amateurish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting Marius. Did ypu have examples from the time as they change from Tosho and Katchushi Plates to Sukashi to compare? Can you explain that?

I wonder about the less comments. I think we all could learn something to figure this out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris S. don't ignore me.  I want to see photos of the rim?  I am neutral until I see more photos of the tsuba in question regardless of who collection it is from.  The initial photos were poor and didn't show any important details to allow even a discussion of age.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Chris,

 

As for being wrong - this happens to all of us. I don't say I am right here. I just gave some points to discuss and I gave you my opinion, which may well be nonsense. 

 

In Sasano's Tosogu no Kigen there are a few early sukashi tsuba. Look at # 33, 34 and 37 (Kamakura and Nambokucho/early Muromachi yo-sukashi). You can also analyse #31 and 32 (kage-sukashi) . All of these guard are utterly different from yours. In my humble opinion your tsuba is a failed attempt to look like an early Owari. But that is my opinion and I am not shinsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find intriguing the hypothesis Marius made, and I'm quite prone to share it. On the other hand judging is often difficult. Here below two papered example (in my opinion quite close each other and to Chris' tsuba); the upper one has been judged true Kanayama, the one below Myōchin (and so a sort of "revival Kanayama", maybe).

post-2065-0-23622000-1550147607_thumb.jpg

Bye, Mauro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a small and less likely chance in my opinion that this could be an early and heavily corroded TSUBA that had been restored by grinding corrosion spots away before re-patinating it. But I tend to second Mariusz' opininon as it is well founded and seems much more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mauro,

 

Good examples, thank you! The Kanayama in your picture is actually pretty restrained - except for one section where the tekkotsu are very pronounced (I would liken this to an imperfection in a piece of pottery, reflecting the "tea taste" typical for Kanayama) the guard is rather quiet. Those pronounced tekkotsu provide a focal point, while in Chris' tsuba a very dramatic hammer work is visible all over the plate, giving it a somewhat unbalanced look ("overdone", if you will). I know, such a description is as "helpful" as the usual write-up BS ;)

 

The Myochin tsuba - yes, it is papered as genuine, but it does look like a revival piece, trying to give us too much tekkotsu as if to ensure us that it reflects the aesthetics of a Kanayama tsuba. 

 

I think it would be nice to submit Chris' tsuba to shinsa, but even their verdict would be an opinion, albeit an educated one, and of course one decisive in terms of market value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on Chris, that is a kidergarden argument, no? ;) And it reminds me somewhat of those people who come here, ask for an opinion and take offence if the answer is not to their liking.

 

I know, you are not such a case, but your or my liking or not has nothing to do with that topic. I know, you have proudly shown your acquisition and here comes the pooh-pooh gang ripping your tsuba apart. I sympathise, but let us stay on topic, which - to my understanding - is whether this is an old tsuba or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris,

 

You mention that your tsuba here has a rim that is less than 3mm thick.  This detail really stood out to me.  I cannot recall ever having seen a genuine early Owari sukashi or Kanayama tsuba with a rim under 4mm, and 5mm, I believe is more typical (even thicker are not uncommon).  I have a Momoyama Period Owari/Kanayama whose rim is 8mm in thickness (see photos).  Going through the Sasano books (which include quite a few Owari and Kanayama tsuba), I cannot find a single example with a rim as thin as that on your piece. 

 

Would anyone be able to offer an example or two of an early Owari/Kanayama sword guard whose rim is under 4mm?

 

Cheers,

 

Steve

post-224-0-35593000-1550167412_thumb.jpeg

post-224-0-41299300-1550167446_thumb.jpg

post-224-0-92795300-1550167471_thumb.jpeg

post-224-0-35704800-1550167500_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old Tsuba no question.  :)

Not 21th century made like Christian said and not a revival piece like Marius said. Btw, there are no Ko-Shoami, Owari oder Kanayama Utsushi revival Tsuba known.

 

Since you have determined it is old, I bow to your superior wisdom and judgment (OK, I am being a troll here). Now have it confirmed by shinsa, and I will take back my slander ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He-ho!

 

i certainly did not write 21th century! :shame:

 

i did write- maybe 18´s, 19´s or early 20´s ( just for putting the lance...)

 

and yes- i do hard doupt this spoken Tsuba is old! (  and with old i do mean the Muromachi/ Momoyama time! - the only time when Kanayama Tsuba were done).

 

 

( i do like your´s Tsuba Steven! :thumbsup: )

 

me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...