Jump to content

Shin Guntō.


Fumei

Recommended Posts

Vladimir, definitely authentic. Appears to be signed Sadamitsu, possibly gimei. At what appears to be 60cm, right on or just under daito length.

 

BTW, there are some significant hakobore (chips) that you should give attention to if this is a sword you are considering. The chips in near the kissaki appear to go halfway through the hamon. The chips lower down the blade are equally deep. It may not be possible to remove these in the next polish and it's questionable whether this sword is worth having restored.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vladimir, definitely authentic. Appears to be signed Sadamitsu, possibly gimei. At what appears to be 60cm, right on or just under daito length.

 

BTW, there are some significant hakobore (chips) that you should give attention to if this is a sword you are considering. The chips in near the kissaki appear to go halfway through the hamon. The chips lower down the blade are equally deep. It may not be possible to remove these in the next polish and it's questionable whether this sword is worth having restored.

 

Thank you so much for your reply. You helped me a lot.  :thumbsup:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vladimir, definitely authentic. Appears to be signed Sadamitsu, possibly gimei. At what appears to be 60cm, right on or just under daito length.

 

BTW, there are some significant hakobore (chips) that you should give attention to if this is a sword you are considering. The chips in near the kissaki appear to go halfway through the hamon. The chips lower down the blade are equally deep. It may not be possible to remove these in the next polish and it's questionable whether this sword is worth having restored.

 

Ray, please I would like to know your opinion, to what period does this sword belong? Meiji or Taishō or Shōwa period?
 
Thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the partial view of the nakago it is difficult to make that evaluation. Can you show the entire nakago? There is an unusually deep sori, especially considering the short length of the blade, which gives a strange appearance to the sugata. Another red flag to my eyes. I'll reiterate my comment above to tread cautiously with this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the partial view of the nakago it is difficult to make that evaluation. Can you show the entire nakago? There is an unusually deep sori, especially considering the short length of the blade, which gives a strange appearance to the sugata. Another red flag to my eyes. I'll reiterate my comment above to tread cautiously with this one.

post-3074-0-25161500-1536774902_thumb.jpg

post-3074-0-87543700-1536774920_thumb.jpeg

post-3074-0-08364300-1536774941_thumb.jpeg

post-3074-0-04106400-1536774954_thumb.jpeg

post-3074-0-27187600-1536774976_thumb.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I would say it is a legitimate Shin-Gunto, and an "old blade". As always, price is a factor when looking to buy, and condition matters. A lot of the older blades are not family pieces, but bought in  to refit for the war effort.  http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/Japanese-militaria/family-short-blades-gunto-688110/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...