Jump to content

Koa Ishin Mantetsu Gunto On Aoi


Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gunto - "military sword" (this refers to all swords in military mounts, not to whether the blade is handmade or not.)

Gendaito - "modern sword" (this refers to the sword having been made between 1876 and 1945, not to whether the blade is handmade or not.)

Showato - "Showa era sword" (this term refers to any sword made during the Showa era, 1926 to 1989, not to whether it is handmade or not.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gunto - "military sword" (this refers to all swords in military mounts, not to whether the blade is handmade or not.)

Gendaito - "modern sword" (this refers to the sword having been made between 1876 and 1945, not to whether the blade is handmade or not.)

Showato - "Showa era sword" (this term refers to any sword made during the Showa era, 1926 to 1989, not to whether it is handmade or not.)

From a literal translation, this is correct. However from the standpoint of how the terms “Gendaito” and “showato” are used to describe swords, the literal translation does not convey how the terms are used today. Gendaito is used as a term to describe swords made from 1876 to 1945 using traditional forging methods and material, where showato is used to describe swords made in the same timeframe, but using non-traditional methods and/or material.

 

I know you know this David, but others may not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, gee. Mantetsu blades are NOT all that uncommon and for a cleaned up pieces from an vendor like Aoi-sama. This price seems pretty reasonable. What I find interesting is the appearance of this sword on a "Japanese" site. Tsuruta-san periodically also offers Nagamitsu and Emura blades as well as other Gendai-to. I strongly suspect that that he has been drawn in this direction by Non-Japanese collectors. That is to say, I think the American interest in War time swords has generated an interest in Japan.Japanese sword collecting is becoming "international"!

Peter

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as you may know, im not that impressed with the prices these sell for. but I can say that this example is poor example compared to the standard koa ishin mantetsu you see.

 

unevan shinoji from tip to tail.

 

evan the mei is abit rough compared to your average piece.

 

for that price you can get a nice emura or nagamitsu out of the US.

 

and I completely agree that the only reason this is on a Japanese dealers website, is to only attract attention outside Japan.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as you may know, im not that impressed with the prices these sell for. but I can say that this example is poor example compared to the standard koa ishin mantetsu you see.

 

unevan shinoji from tip to tail.

 

evan the mei is abit rough compared to your average piece.

 

for that price you can get a nice emura or nagamitsu out of the US.

 

and I completely agree that the only reason this is on a Japanese dealers website, is to only attract attention outside Japan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No GUNTO collection is really complete without a MANTETSU, MINATOGAWA and YASUKUNI to study and appreciate. Emura and Nagamitsu are great Showa smiths, as are many many others of this period.

Swords sell for what a buyer is willing to pay, and it just so happens that there is a big demand for good Gunto, especially the less common ones. So don't be surprised at current prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hamfish, if you read carefully, they were not put in any "quality" category. My comment was based on what blades would be interesting to study, for different reasons, from different origins, that would make an interesting Gunto collection. I enjoy my three examples for different reasons.  I have done enough research to know the differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All good. There is still some mystery associated with the MANTETSU blades. What locations were they made, who made them, what is the meaning of the numbering system on the mune. There is also conjecture on the types of forging processes. It has long been thought that a soft iron (lower carbon) rod was inserted into a harder tube (higher carbon), and drawn out by heating and hammer welding, but not folded. This obviously gave a extremely heat treatable outer skin, whilst providing a resilient inner core. BUT, some members on NMB have posted photos  of their blades which show a defined HAHA.

So the theory of multiple locations, multiple smiths and a variety of process makes for good study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...