Jump to content

Shinsa Nbthk March 2017


Recommended Posts

Hi Francesco

 

I heard through Paul Martin that NBTHK HQ will be closing for renovations from MArch 2017 so it might be a bit of a delay till 2017 November or later. Please check this before submissions.

 

Generally Peter is correct here on the 3 month lead time.

 

Rayhan Perera

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you :-)

 

From: http://www.touken.or.jp/english/ann_museum.htm

"In 2017, NBTHK shinsa events for swords will be in March, and touso and tousogu shinsa will be in April in the current Yoyogi location. After this date there will be a temporary break in the shinsa schedule."

 

I found this: http://www.nbthk-ab.org/Shinsa.html

 

"How long after I submit to shinsa will it be before I know the results?
 
Results are usually distributed at the end of the month following
the shinsa, but delays do happen for various reasons, and results
may take longer depending on the particular circumstance.
 
How long after I receive papers will it be before I receive my item back?
 
It can vary depending on the broker's schedule, the individual
shinsa volume, and even very special occasions when a sword
or fitting will be displayed at the NBTHK Museum for a few weeks. 
In general however, 4-6 months is the average turn-around time,
but again it varies from broker to broker."
 
 
--------------
Any of you have a personal experience about to shinsa times?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Any of you have a personal experience about to shinsa times?

 

 

Hi Francesco, I had a few swords sent in November 2016 and the results are still waiting to be published, I have been told it should be out this month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have such a problem. I put my swords through agent for shinsa. The agent wrote to me that no sword had passed. The question is: how will he prove to me that this is true? Do you have a similar experience? Does the NBTHK issue any evidence that the swords were there and did not passed ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Simon,

Your agent should have the pink slips of the NBTHK with the submission/failure on it - the NBTHK doesn't give you any additional info as to why it failed if I'm not mistaken.

 

Regarding the original post - I had some items in the April Tosogu shinsa which were already returned to me. Still waiting for the papers though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As they have already written, if shinsa don't pass, a small pink sheet is given, at least for tosogu it is specified whether it is gimei, cast or else.

So your agent must give you these "receipts".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An agent's future business depends on his honesty, Francesco, & the word would get around fast if he really failed to submit your blade, while telling you that he did. Is there some reason you think that he didn't submit it, or are you just upset that he told you of its failure?

 

Ken

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the blade was submitted and failed he will have a notice from the NBTHK that he can give you. Along with the bill. 

 

March 2017 results should be out as of a couple of days ago.

 

I know because I am angry. 

Gonna need you to expound on this, would be interested in story for sure! DM if you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading between the lines of these posts one gets the message that many blades did not make the grade in March, and some people will be wanting to know a little more as to why. Could there be some constraints at work, possibly that recent shinsa have been too loose, or some such?

 

A beautiful blade of mine failed some years ago, with the single word 'Gimei'. Well, maybe, but I was hoping to learn more about the blade itself. To add insult to injury someone had added in spidery writing that there was a nick in the edge of the kissaki. Ah so? Under a microsope perhaps! Grrr.... :steamed:  (I was so shocked and disappointed that I sold it soon afterwards, and have regretted that ever since!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No blades for me, just frustrating results (horyu = reserved = we are not going to give an answer = two stubborn guys arguing and not able to compromise on an answer) on some tosogu I have had in the drawer for a long time. Which I gather is par for the course for a lot of people lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Darcy, but was this shinsa for blade and tosogu or only for blade?

 

In that case how do they proceed? They hold it longer and ask opinion to some other expert (for example Tanobe sensei)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, finally, I got a message from the agent. All blades (5) do not pass. I do not understand that. I would have liked to bet that at least two were fine. I think there's something wrong with NBTHK shinsa. Perhaps they had a lot and did not want to examine properly. That brings me another question.

 

Does it make sense to send it back later ? Do they know then that it was already there ?

Or maybe I should try NTHK ? I do not like NBTHK anyway. They are obsolete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, finally, I got a message from the agent. All blades (5) do not pass. I do not understand that. I would have liked to bet that at least two were fine. I think there's something wrong with NBTHK shinsa. Perhaps they had a lot and did not want to examine properly. That brings me another question.
 
Does it make sense to send it back later ? Do they know then that it was already there ?
Or maybe I should try NTHK ? I do not like NBTHK anyway. They are obsolete.

 

Simon,

 

I can understand you that you are shocked!! I would send it to NTHK in any case to have a second opinion and as they blades are in JP. In the past I sent a blade for papering to NTHK Yoshikawa but unfortunately failed :sad: --> but received paper from NTHK-NPO... ;-)

Sometimes it is like a lottery..... :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at trends in Tsuruta-san's postings - it seems that the criteria for Hozon has been increased lately. He used to say "we guarantee hozon" far more liberally, and I faintly recall a comment with some frustration undertone saying he would guarantee it, but that he isn't so sure these days anymore. 

 

Perhaps its a conscious attempt to increase standards as a backlash for a overly lax ones in the recent past, or perhaps a tentative to keep hozon inflation under control. Who knows.  

 

It would be good to have some sort of simplified feedback, to keep frustration to a minimum - but the potential to offend would probably be intolerable. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simon

I can understand you are disappointed, I would be too if 5 out of 5 failed. I think the idea of sending them to the NTHK is a good. As Klaus says  getting an alternative opinion. is always worthwhile.

But tell me does your not liking the NBTHK come from the fact that they failed your 5 swords or did you think they were obsolete before you sent them? If so why did you send them to the NBTHK first and not the NTHK?

years ago I had the opposite experience when involved with and NTHK shinsa in the UK a number of submissions were rejected and immediately  it was the NTHK was at fault in the eyes of the owner. Interestingly enough no one complained if they got a better than expected attribution.

Regardless of the body you submit to we seem to have a distorted expectation. i.e. the organisation is only good if they agree with us and meet our expectation. If we are so sure of our own attribution why are we seeking alternative opinions?

Do they always get it right, no absolutely not, I have personal experience of blades being attributed to different smiths 500 years apart by different organisations. However they have access to a far greater pool of swords than I do see a lot more authentic work than I do so I tend to value their opinion more than mine.

As said I understand your disappointment and would feel much the same in the same situation but I do not think it fair or reasonable to call them obsolete just because they didn't tell you what you wanted to hear.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simon, I just had a chat with someone well aware of the workings of the NBTHK board, and asked him some of your questions above re the March shinsa in Tokyo.

 

He says that the judges really do take their work seriously, and they do allot proper time to deliberate over each sword individually.

 

He also said that the standard is pretty much the same; in his experience it has not been getting noticeably stricter recently.

 

If possible, I would go with some of the advice above and try for NTHK papers, even if a second opinion means waiting longer to get them home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But tell me does your not liking the NBTHK come from the fact that they failed your 5 swords or did you think they were obsolete before you sent them? If so why did you send them to the NBTHK first and not the NTHK?

 

Because most collectors prefer NBTHK paper. I do not. If they issue a document, they do not write anything, period, generation, hamon, etc etc ...

 

 

 

As said I understand your disappointment and would feel much the same in the same situation but I do not think it fair or reasonable to call them obsolete just because they didn't tell you what you wanted to hear.

Obsolete : Not because the swords did not pass. Because they do not speak English. They do not write English. They do not publish the results. They do not have online document checking. You can not send a sword directly to them. They will not send it back to you. Everything has to go through the agents. They do not meet deadlines. It takes them all a long time. Nor do I know who is in the commission. (Once I met Judge Shinsa ia AOI, I showed him something, he told me, do not try to shinsa- gimei, and I sent it to shinsa - and the result was Hozon.)

 

But one more time: Does it make sense to send it back to NBTHK again? Do they know they have not passed last time ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, (I mean no, it doesn't make sense) because in my experience these people have close to photographic memories!

 

The only way is to wait for a new generation, or have the Mei professionally erased and try again. I have heard stories of the sword then being attributed to the very person whose Mei was on there in the first place!!! :laughing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard mixed feedback regarding resubmission. Mostly I agree with Piers and re-submitted swords that have failed fail again or are not considered, I am not sure which. In other cases you hear stories of swords being submitted multiple times and obtain different results but again I do not know over which timeframe.

Regarding your other points

1. I would love the NBTHK to do more in English but I choose to study a Japanese subject the fact that I dont understand their native tongue is mine not theirs.

2. I am hopeful, but little more than that that the move to new premises will facilitate better communication (at least email rather than fax) but dont know if that would happen.

3.I agree it would be much more helpful to be given more information and to be able to submit directly. To to this would require higher staffing levels at their end and necesitate increased fees to cover costs. Is it worth it? possibly but so far they havent wanted to do this and prefer to rely on agents to do the handling.

 

Simon,

I believe at the moment the NBTHK offers the best option regarding attribution. I think they are to some extent the victim of their own success and struggle with the volume of submissions they recieve, especially from overseas. You submitted 5 swords, twenty years ago I doubt they received 5 in total from outside Japan for a shinsa session. 

We can hope they improve, certainly my expereince with the NBTHK EU is that they work continually with the HQ in Tokyo to make sure they are aware of such feedback. 

In the meantime I think the advice given, regarding submitting to an alternative body may be the best for now.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kübler-Ross model  ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model )

 

 

Stages of grief

 

The stages, popularly known by the acronym DABDA, include:[4]

  1. Denial – The first reaction is denial. In this stage individuals believe the diagnosis is somehow mistaken, and cling to a false, preferable reality.
  2. Anger – When the individual recognizes that denial cannot continue, they become frustrated, especially at proximate individuals. Certain psychological responses of a person undergoing this phase would be: "Why me? It's not fair!"; "How can this happen to me?"; "Who is to blame?"; "Why would this happen?".
  3. Bargaining – The third stage involves the hope that the individual can avoid a cause of grief. Usually, the negotiation for an extended life is made in exchange for a reformed lifestyle. People facing less serious trauma can bargain or seek compromise. For instance: "I'd give anything to have him back." Or: "If only he'd come back to life, I'd promise to be a better person!"
  4. Depression – "I'm so sad, why bother with anything?"; "I'm going to die soon, so what's the point?"; "I miss my loved one, why go on?"
    During the fourth stage, the individual despairs at the recognition of their mortality. In this state, the individual may become silent, refuse visitors and spend much of the time mournful and sullen.
  5. Acceptance – "It's going to be okay."; "I can't fight it; I may as well prepare for it."
    In this last stage, individuals embrace mortality or inevitable future, or that of a loved one, or other tragic event. People dying may precede the survivors in this state, which typically comes with a calm, retrospective view for the individual, and a stable condition of emotions.
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...