Jump to content

Milne Bay Sword - Lt Gordon Harvey 42nd Bn 2/AIF


dnmmilo

Recommended Posts

I recently purchased this sword from Bob Harvey here in Canberra. Bob is the son of Gordon Harvey, an officer who served with the 42nd Battalion 2/AIF in New Guinea who Bob states picked this sword up either during or immediately after the Battle of Milne Bay. Although I was happy to buy the sword I did suggest that Bob keep it in the family, as it is an heirloom. but he was keen to sell it as he doesn't like it in the house. He was good enough to provide me with a photograph and some newspaper cuttings about his father which I have attached.

post-4418-14196868233907_thumb.jpg

post-4418-14196868240185_thumb.jpg

Lt_Gordon_Harvey_42_Bn.pdf

Lt_Gordon_Harvey_News_Article_Jan_1970_-_Townsville_daily_Bulletin.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sword appears to my inexperienced eye to have had additional mekugi-ana drilled into the nakago to attach the tsuka. These appear to have obscured the inscription which I cannot translate.

 

I'd be really grateful for any information on the sword and specifically on the blade type. One specific question I do have concerns the fuller in in the blade is that an indicator of age or style or smith or none of the above?

 

Additional pictures attached. Let me know if any other pictures would be useful.

 

Cheers David

post-4418-14196868288517_thumb.jpg

post-4418-14196868293959_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morita san,

I think the picture is giving a false impression of the hi with reflections, and it is a regular looking bo-hi and soe-hi.

If well cut, then often an indication of a better quality sword.

 

Brian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morita san,

I think the picture is giving a false impression of the hi with reflections, and it is a regular looking bo-hi and soe-hi.

If well cut, then often an indication of a better quality sword.

 

Brian

 

Hello Brian,

I guess Morita san wanted to direct our attention to the regular shape of the hi: it is a regular ryo chiri bo-hi.

BUT the Miike school is famous for their VERY wide and shallow hi, which is an unique feature if originally made into the sword.

Those hi on the pictured sword are different, definitely not Miike like hi.

 

Greetings

Andreas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all of your comments and for your information. With regard to my previous question, I was interested to know whether the additional holes and the style of the blade where also an indicator of age and maker or whether they are just a characteristic of this particular smith?

 

Cheers David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David,

Additional holes are the result of remounting over the years. Extremely common and no indication of anything else.

Andreas and Morits san...I was not aware of that. Thanks for the info.

Does someone have a pic of a typical Miike horimono?

 

Brian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers Brian, As for the over cleaning, I'll have to put my hand to that. When Bob brought the sword over it took a fair amount of time and WD40 to remove the Tsuka as it was pretty well stuck. Once it was off it was pretty clear that while Bob and his father had kept the blade well oiled the haft was very heavily oxidized. My reason for cleaning it was simply that one character was very partially visible but certainly not readable. Thanks again, I really do appreciate the time and effort you fella's put in to educating those of us with an interest - David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what miike Hi looks like, but this sword's bohi looks squarish and fairly "wide".. I am interested in seeing better pictures and I'm with Brian on seeing other examples.. OP- do not remove the patina from the nakago (tang)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tenta is another name for Mitsuyo

 

http://books.google.fr/books?id=vFS2iT8 ... ol&f=false

 

From this school, Very very few blades with a mei have survived .... If you look at the suguta, Miike swords are incredibly stout/large. Almost no fumbari, even width and wide shinogiji. To reduce the weight of the blade a large groove covers the shinogiji.

 

Once you have seen a Miike sword, you have almost seen all of them. Their suguta has not changed for centuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

G'day Guys, I've attached a couple more photo's and can take more if anyone would like to see them. One of these pictures is of the edge of the nakago which looked as though it may have had a character on it, alternatively it may just have been the cicatrice from the oxidization. I've also photographed the unmarked side of the haft another of the whole blade. Lastly, there are some characters scratched into the seppa and tsuba. Thanks for all of the interest and information. Cheers David

post-4418-14196868494912_thumb.jpg

post-4418-14196868500399_thumb.jpg

post-4418-14196868504975_thumb.jpg

post-4418-14196868510063_thumb.jpg

post-4418-14196868515313_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.sho-shin.com/sai4.htm

 

If you prefer I'll change for little fumbari compare to the otther schools of same period.

 

Now take the measurements, moto haba/saki haba, take the definition of fumbari and have a look at the blade oshigata, if you see a very strong fumbari :bowdown:

 

Old blades are curved and evenly wide to the kissaki

 

BTW, I had the occasion of studying in hands two Miike swords, an utsushi and one juyo. If fumbari has to be taken as a kantei point, it is by its weakness. This comes from the fact that the blades are very large. This is the school which has probably produced the stoutest tachi.

 

Miike school is famed for having produced this kind of tachi for centuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes exactly 3 bu, and they are evenly distributed along the blade which is perfectly normal for an ikubi kissaki (I don't call this fumbari) you will never see a real fumbari in an ikubi kissaki tachi (cf. Nakayama Kokan - The connoisseur's book of Japanese swords. P. 69) and it is mechanically perfectly understandable.

To have a real fumbari (a big tapering in the first few inches starting from the motohaba) the moto haba should be at least of 1,3 sun considering that apart the fumbari effect the tapering continues till a 9 bu sakihaba. This could not be possible with the characteristic of their bohi.

 

The Odenta was forged around Sho-ho and has a sugata of mid Kamakura. This is a characteristic of Miike school. From Heian to late Kamakura, their sugata have not changed, so early Miike swords are difficult to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jean,

 

3 bu on a blade which is short (65,7 cm) is not negligible, almost normal,

 

 

I think you misunderstand the word funbari :

 

http://www.ksky.ne.jp./~sumie99/kissaki.html#FUMBARI

 

The Odenta was forged around Sho-ho and has a suguta of mid Kamakura. This is a characteristic of Miike school.

 

No,

 

img-7180_imagesia-com_8gik_small.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jacques,

 

No confusion on funbari definition: very strong tapering from the base, which, of course, slows down.

 

The document you have attached shows that this blade is not considered as having a funbari:

 

As for this type of masculine construction in which the mihaba is wide and where there is little difference between the moto haba and the saki haba....

 

no place for funbari. The difference of width between moto haba and saki haba is considered as peanuts:

 

little difference

 

This is confirmed by the sentence you have underlined: this sentence states that two different sugata existed at the Heian period, the one with a strong funbari which is also seen at the beginning of Kamakura and this one, large with no funbari and an ikubi kissaki. The first one being more common.

 

What is unique in Miike school is that this sugata has survived for centuries and that associated with the large bohi and even width shinogi ji it is a kantei point for the Miike school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

G'day Jean,

 

I am most grateful to you and the other members for sharing your knowledge and experience with us. I have tried to follow your conversation as best I can (given my limited knowledge of the subject) but would really appreciate it if you could outline it in layman's terms for me as I am obviously interested in it and whether it applies to my sword.

 

Cheers David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David,

 

Very few signed examples from this school exist. The characteristic of this school from Heian to late Kamakura are:

 

- robust and large/stout blade with an even large shinogi ji which is fully covered by a single groove (bo hi), the shinogi when entering the nakago is almost in the middle of the blade.

 

In the link I have provided, you have all the details for the characteristics of the blades.

 

I draw ypur attention on the fact that:

 

- it remains very very few blades signed Mitsuyo

- the constant is a very large bo hi, very large because the shinogi ji is very large with no soe bi

- if you look at the grooves, they just enter the nakago, so this one is almost ubu or ubu as the signature remains

- look at your picture 509_08.jpg. This sword has not been polished often.

 

The nakago is suspicious, it seems it has been cleaned, no sign of yasurime which could induce a very old blade, but in total contradiction with the grooves which are fresh.

 

My opinion, a gimei or very bad utsushi of a Miike swords not so old (cf freshness of the grooves, lack of numerous polishes)

I draw also your attention on the hamachi which seems to be non existant (very ifficult to see from your pictures) which is in total contradiction with this sword having had few polishes. Not many ware for an old blade :)

 

But what do I know ...... :laughabove:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Jean,

 

You clearly know a great deal.

 

As I mentioned in my earlier post, the state of the nakago is my doing. When I purchased the sword from Bob Harvey, the Tsuka was extremely difficult to remove. Bob and his father had kept the blade well oiled but the haft was very heavily oxidized and had fused into the wood of the Tsuka. While one character was very partially visible it certainly wouldn't have been possible to make out the signature without removing the encrusted oxidisation.

 

In retrospect, I realise I shouldn't have touched the sword but I now know better.

 

Cheers David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...